Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30244369›Full record

Trial reportOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2019

The risk of subsequent osteoporotic fractures is decreased in subjects experiencing fracture while on denosumab: results from the FREEDOM and FREEDOM Extension studies.

D L Kendler, A Chines, M L Brandi, S Papapoulos, E M Lewiecki, J-Y Reginster, M Muñoz Torres, A Wang, H G Bone

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00523341 (An Open Label, Single Arm, Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Sustained Efficacy of Denosumab), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00523341 phase3completednot on this map

An Open Label, Single Arm, Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Sustained Efficacy of Denosumab (AMG162) in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorAmgenRan2007 to 2015Enrolled4,550ConditionsOsteopenia, OsteoporosisArmsDenosumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Romosozumab in patients who experienced an on-study fracture: post hoc analyses of the FRAME and ARCH phase 3 trials.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Trial
  4. Romosozumab efficacy and safety in European patients enrolled in the FRAME trial.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Goal-directed osteoporosis treatment: ASBMR/BHOF task force position statement 2024.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Biologic Antiresorptive: Denosumab.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2023
    Article
  14. Approach to the Patient With Bone Fracture: Making the First Fracture the Last.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023
    Article
  15. Osteoporosis Medications Prevent Subsequent Fracture in Frail Older Adults.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Should denosumab treatment for osteoporosis be continued indefinitely?Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2021
    Review
  18. Article
  19. A Review on the Role of Denosumab in Fracture Prevention.Drug design, development and therapy · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

D L KendlerUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. davidkendler@gmail.com.
A ChinesAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
M L BrandiUniversity of Florence, Florence, Italy.
S PapapoulosLeiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
E M LewieckiNew Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
J-Y ReginsterUniversity of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
M Muñoz TorresHospital Universitario San Cecilio, Granada, Spain.
A WangAmgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA.
H G BoneMichigan Bone and Mineral Clinic, Detroit, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This post-hoc analysis queried whether women experiencing fracture on denosumab indicates inadequate treatment response or whether the risk of subsequent fracture remains low with continuing denosumab. Results showed that denosumab decreases the risk of subsequent fracture and fracture sustained while on denosumab is not necessarily indicative of inadequate treatment response.

introductionThis analysis assessed whether a fracture sustained during denosumab therapy indicates inadequate treatment response and if the risk of a subsequent fracture decreases with continuing denosumab treatment.

methodsIn FREEDOM, a clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of denosumab, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized to placebo or denosumab for 3 years. In the 7-year FREEDOM Extension, all participants were allocated to receive denosumab. Here we compare subsequent osteoporotic fracture rates between denosumab-treated subjects during FREEDOM or the Extension and placebo-treated subjects in FREEDOM.

resultsDuring FREEDOM, 438 placebo- and 272 denosumab-treated subjects had an osteoporotic fracture. Exposure-adjusted subject incidence per 100 subject-years was lower for denosumab (6.7) vs placebo (10.1). Combining all subjects on denosumab from FREEDOM and the Extension for up to 10 years (combined denosumab), 794 (13.7%) had an osteoporotic fracture while on denosumab. Of these, one or more subsequent fractures occurred in 144 (18.1%) subjects, with an exposure-adjusted incidence of 5.8 per 100 subject-years, similar to FREEDOM denosumab (6.7 per 100 subject-years) and lower than FREEDOM placebo (10.1 per 100 subject-years). Adjusting for prior fracture, the risk of having a subsequent on-study osteoporotic fracture was lower in the combined denosumab group vs placebo (hazard ratio [95% CI]: 0.59 [0.43-0.81]; P = 0.0012).

conclusionsThese data demonstrate that denosumab decreases the risk of subsequent fracture and a fracture sustained while on denosumab is not necessarily indicative of inadequate treatment response.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBone DensityBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDouble-Blind MethodFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalOsteoporotic FracturesRecurrenceSpinal FracturesBone Density Conservation AgentsDenosumabDenosumabFractureOsteoporosisSubsequent fracture

Identifiers

PMID30244369
PMCPMC6331737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.