Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30244355›Full record

ArticleAmbio2019

Probing into farmers' perceptions of a globally endangered ecosystem service provider.

Marina García-Alfonso, Zebensui Morales-Reyes, Laura Gangoso, Willem Bouten, José A Sánchez-Zapata, David Serrano, José A Donázar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ambio, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Vultures and Livestock: The Where, When, and Why of Visits to Farms.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Marina García-AlfonsoDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), C/Américo Vespucio 26, 41092, Seville, Spain. margaralf@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4953-7207
Zebensui Morales-ReyesDepartment of Applied Biology, Miguel Hernández University, Avda. de la Universidad, s/n, 03202, Elche, Spain.
Laura GangosoInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Willem BoutenInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Science Park 904, 1098 XH, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
José A Sánchez-ZapataDepartment of Applied Biology, Miguel Hernández University, Avda. de la Universidad, s/n, 03202, Elche, Spain.
David SerranoDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), C/Américo Vespucio 26, 41092, Seville, Spain.
José A DonázarDepartment of Conservation Biology, Estación Biológica de Doñana (CSIC), C/Américo Vespucio 26, 41092, Seville, Spain.

Funding

Dirección general de Protección de la Naturaleza (Viceconsejería de Medio Ambiente, Gobierno de Canarias) severalENDESA Convenio EBD(CSIC)-ENDESA"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad" and EU/FEDER CGL2012-40013-C02-02"Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad" and EU/FEDER CGL2015-66966-C2-1-RMinisterio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte FPU12/00823Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte FPU13/05429Severo Ochoa Excellence Award from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad SEV-2012-0262
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Society's perception of ecosystem services is a key issue in conservation, particularly for endangered species providing services linked to human activities. Misperceptions may lead to wildlife-human conflicts with the risk of disappearance of the species involved. We contrasted farmers' perceptions with highly accurate quantitative data of an endangered vulture species, which provide ecosystem services. We combined surveys of 59 farmers with data from 48 GPS-tagged Canarian Egyptian vultures (Neophron percnopterus majorensis endemic to the Spanish Canary Islands) to disentangle factors influencing consistency between farmers' awareness of vulture occurrence on their properties and vulture behavior. Egyptian vultures were perceived as the main providers of scavenging services and the most beneficial avian scavenger. Consistency between farmers' perceptions (surveys) and vulture use of their farms (GPS data) was higher in the morning, in older males, and at farms with lower livestock numbers, located near vulture communal roosts, and visited more frequently by vultures. Our results underline the potential influence of modern livestock husbandry in disconnecting people from ecosystems, and how appreciation could be even lower for scarce or threatened ecosystem service providers.

Indexed as

EcosystemFalconiformesAgedAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesFarmersHumansMaleSpainBiodiversity conservationCanary IslandsEgyptian vulturesGPS trackingLocal ecological knowledgeSocial perception

Identifiers

PMID30244355
PMCPMC6541662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.