ArticleBMJ open2018
Development of the individualised Comparative Effectiveness of Models Optimizing Patient Safety and Resident Education (iCOMPARE) trial: a protocol summary of a national cluster-randomised trial of resident duty hour policies in internal medicine.
Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02274818 (Individualized Comparative Effectiveness of Models Optimizing Patient Safety and Resident Education), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Individualized Comparative Effectiveness of Models Optimizing Patient Safety and Resident Education (iCOMPARE).
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Adapting shift work schedules for sleep quality, sleep duration, and sleepiness in shift workers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023Pooled it
- Sleep and Alertness in a Duty-Hour Flexibility Trial in Internal Medicine.The New England journal of medicine · 2019Trial
- Patient Safety Outcomes under Flexible and Standard Resident Duty-Hour Rules.The New England journal of medicine · 2019Trial
- Sleep and Alertness Among Interns in Intensive Care Compared to General Medicine Rotations: A Secondary Analysis of the iCOMPARE Trial.Journal of graduate medical education · 2021Article
- An Ergogenic Medical Education: Building Curricula to Optimize Performance and Decrease Burnout.Cureus · 2021Article
- Assessment of Inpatient Time Allocation Among First-Year Internal Medicine Residents Using Time-Motion Observations.JAMA internal medicine · 2019Observational
- Implementation of 2011 Duty Hours Regulations through a Workload Reduction Strategy and Impact on Residency Training.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionMedical trainees' duty hours have received attention globally; restrictions in Europe, New Zealand and some Canadian provinces are much lower than the 80 hours per week enforced in USA. In USA, resident duty hours have been implemented without evidence simultaneously reflecting competing concerns about patient safety and physician education. The objective is to prospectively evaluate the implications of alternative resident duty hour rules for patient safety, trainee education and intern sleep and alertness. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 63 US internal medicine training programmes were randomly assigned 1:1 to the 2011 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education resident duty hour rules or to rules more flexible in intern shift length and number of hours off between shifts for academic year 2015-2016. The primary outcome is calculated for each programme as the difference in 30-day mortality rate among Medicare beneficiaries with any of several prespecified principal diagnoses in the intervention year minus 30-day mortality in the preintervention year among Medicare beneficiaries with any of several prespecified principal diagnoses. Additional safety outcomes include readmission rates, prolonged length of stay and costs. Measures derived from trainees' and faculty responses to surveys and from time-motion studies of interns compare the educational experiences of residents. Measures derived from wrist actigraphy, subjective ratings and psychomotor vigilance testing compare the sleep and alertness of interns. Differences between duty hour groups in outcomes will be assessed by intention-to-treat analyses. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The University of Pennsylvania Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved the protocol and served as the IRB of record for 40 programmes that agreed to sign an Institutional Affiliation Agreement. Twenty-three programmes opted for a local review process. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02274818; Pre-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.