Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30244095›Full record

ArticleBehavioural processes2018

The discriminative stimulus effects of nicotine & ethanol with two distinct olfactory contexts in male and female rats.

Joseph R Troisi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural processes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Joseph R TroisiDepartment of Psychology, Saint Anselm College, 100 Saint Anselm Drive, Manchester, NH 03102, United States. Electronic address: jtroisi@anselm.edu.

Funding

Ultrastructural analysis of axonal Kv2-mediated endoplasmic reticulum/plasma membrane (ER/PM) junctionsP20GM103506 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI STEVEN FIERING · 2012 to 2026
$60.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103506
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Odor cues and interoceptive cues can combine in promoting drug seeking behavior. Drug discrimination methodology was combined with odor-context conditioning in 8 male and 8 female rats. One drug (nicotine or EtOH) plus odorant (peppermint or anise) compound functioned as setting the occasion for sessions of food-reinforced nose poke responses (i.e., the S

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsConditioning, OperantCuesDiscrimination LearningDose-Response Relationship, DrugEthanolFemaleMaleNicotineRatsReinforcement, PsychologySmellEthanolNicotineCompound conditioningConfigural learningDrug discriminationEthanolNicotineOlfactory contextsSex differences

Identifiers

PMID30244095
PMCPMC6240364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.