ArticleAlcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.)2019
Applying a novel population-based model approach to estimating breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) from transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) biosensor data.
Article in Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05692830 (Towards a Wearable Alcohol Biosensor), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Towards a Wearable Alcohol Biosensor: Examining the Accuracy of BAC Estimates From New-Generation Transdermal Technology Using Large-Scale Human Testing and Machine Learning Algorithms
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Validating transdermal alcohol biosensors: a meta-analysis of associations between blood/breath-based measures and transdermal alcohol sensor output.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2022Pooled it
- Integrating Alcohol Biosensors With Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI) for Alcohol Use: a Synthesis of the Latest Literature and Directions for Future Research.Current addiction reports · 2024Article
- Acceptability and anklet user experience with the SCRAM-CAM transdermal alcohol concentration sensor in regularly drinking young adults' natural environments.Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Wearable alcohol monitors for alcohol use data collection among college students: Feasibility and acceptability.Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) · 2023Article
- Assessing real-time positive subjective effects of alcohol using high-resolution ecological momentary assessment in risky versus light drinkers.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2023Article
- Flexible Textile-Based Sweat Sensors for Wearable Applications.Biosensors · 2023Review
- Effects of stomach content on the breath alcohol concentration-transdermal alcohol concentration relationship.Drug and alcohol review · 2021Article
- Wrist-worn alcohol biosensors: Applications and usability in behavioral research.Alcohol (Fayetteville, N.Y.) · 2021Article
- Assessment of Alcohol Use in the Natural Environment.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Alcohol biosensor devices have been developed to unobtrusively measure transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC), the amount of ethanol diffusing through the skin, in nearly continuous fashion in naturalistic settings. Because TAC data are affected by physiological and environmental factors that vary across individuals and drinking episodes, there is not an elementary formula to convert TAC into easily interpretable metrics such as blood and breath alcohol concentrations (BAC/BrAC). In our prior work, we addressed this conversion problem in a deterministic way by developing physics/physiological-based models to convert TAC to estimated BrAC (eBrAC), in which the model parameter values were individually determined for each person wearing a specific transdermal sensor using simultaneously collected TAC (via a biosensor) and BrAC (via a breath analyzer) during a calibration episode. We found these individualized parameter values produced relatively good eBrAC curves for subsequent drinking episodes, but our results also indicated the models were not fully capturing the dynamics of the system and variations across drinking episodes. Here, we report on a novel mathematical framework to improve our ability to model eBrAC from TAC data that uses aggregate population data instead of individualized calibration data to determine model parameter values via a random diffusion equation. We first provide the theoretical mathematical basis for our approach, and then test the efficacy of this method using datasets of contemporaneous BrAC/TAC measurements obtained by a) a single subject during multiple drinking episodes and b) multiple subjects during single drinking episodes. For each dataset, we used a set of drinking episodes to construct the population model, and then ran the model with another set of randomly selected test episodes. We compared raw TAC data to model-simulated TAC curve, breath analyzer BrAC data to model eBrAC curve with 75% credible bands, episode summary scores of peak BrAC, times of peak BrAC, and area under the drinking curve also with 75% credible intervals, and report the percent of the raw BrAC captured within the eBrAC curve credible bands. We also display results when stratifying the data based on the relationship between the raw BrAC and TAC data. Results indicate the population-based model is promising, with better fit within a single participant when stratifying episodes. This study provides initial proof-of-concept for constructing, fitting, and using a population-based model to obtain estimates and error bands for BrAC from TAC. The advancements in this study, including new applications of math, the development of a population-based model with error bars, and the production of corresponding MATLAB codes, represent a major step forward in our ability to produce quantitatively- and temporally-accurate estimates of BrAC from TAC biosensor data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.