Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30243803›Full record

Trial reportThe lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology2018

LeucoPatch system for the management of hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers in the UK, Denmark, and Sweden: an observer-masked, randomised controlled trial.

Frances Game, William Jeffcoate, Lise Tarnow, Judith L Jacobsen, Diane J Whitham, Eleanor F Harrison, Sharon J Ellender, Deborah Fitzsimmons, Magnus Löndahl, LeucoPatch II trial team

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02224742 phase4completednot on this map

LeucoPatch in the Management of Hard-to-heal Diabetic Foot Ulcers

TypeinterventionalSponsorNottingham University Hospitals NHS TrustRan2013 to 2018Enrolled269ConditionsDiabetic Foot UlcerArmsLeucoPatch, Usual care
NCT03997526 terminatednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Reapplix 3C Patch® System for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Medicare Claims Study

TypeobservationalSponsorReapplixRan2020 to 2022Enrolled22ConditionsDiabetic Foot UlcerArms3C Patch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. The use of platelet-rich plasma in wound healing and vitiligo: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2023
    Pooled it
  7. Guideline
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. M.O.I.S.T. Concept for the Local Therapy of Chronic Wounds: An International Update.The international journal of lower extremity wounds · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Frances GameDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Derby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK. Electronic address: frances.game@nhs.net.
William JeffcoateDepartment of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Nottingham University Hospitals Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Lise TarnowSteno Diabetes Center Zealand, Holbaek Sygehus, Holbaek, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Judith L JacobsenStatcon ApS, Kokkedal, Denmark; Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Diane J WhithamNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Eleanor F HarrisonNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Sharon J EllenderNottingham Clinical Trials Unit, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Deborah FitzsimmonsSwansea Centre for Health Economics, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Magnus LöndahlDepartment of Endocrinology, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden; Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund, Lund University.
LeucoPatch II trial team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe LeucoPatch device uses bedside centrifugation without additional reagents to generate a disc comprising autologous leucocytes, platelets, and fibrin, which is applied to the surface of the wound. We aimed to test the effectiveness of LeucoPatch on the healing of hard-to-heal foot ulcers in people with diabetes.

methodsThis was a multicentre, international, observer-masked, randomised controlled trial of people with diabetes and a hard-to-heal foot ulcer done in 32 specialist diabetic foot clinics in three countries (UK, Denmark, and Sweden). After a 4-week run-in period, those with a reduction in ulcer area of less than 50% were randomly allocated (1:1) by computer-generated, web-based randomisation (block sizes of two, four, and six) to either prespecified good standard care alone or care plus weekly application of LeucoPatch. The primary outcome was the proportion of ulcers that healed within 20 weeks assessed in the intention-to-treat population (all participants with post-randomisation data collected), defined as complete epithelialisation (confirmed by an observer who was masked to randomisation group), and remained healed for 4 weeks. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, number 27665670, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02224742.

findingsBetween Aug 30, 2013, and May 3, 2017, 269 participants were randomly allocated to receive treatment (137 to receive standard care and 132 to receive LeucoPatch). The mean age was 61·9 years (SD 11·6), 217 (82%) were men, and 222 (83%) had type 2 diabetes. In the LeucoPatch group, 45 (34%) of 132 ulcers healed within 20 weeks versus 29 (22%) of 134 ulcers in the standard care group (odds ratio 1·58, 96% CI 1·04-2·40; p=0·0235) by intention-to-treat analysis. Time to healing was shorter in the LeucoPatch group (p=0·0246) than in the standard care group. No difference in adverse events was seen between the groups. The most common serious adverse event (SAE) was diabetic foot infection (24 events in the LeucoPatch group [24% of all SAEs] and 20 in the standard care group [27% of all SAEs]. There were no device-related adverse events.

interpretationThe use of LeucoPatch is associated with significant enhancement of healing of hard-to-heal foot ulcers in people with diabetes.

fundingReapplix ApS.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsLeukocytesWound HealingDenmarkDiabetic FootDrug Delivery SystemsFemaleFibrinHumansMaleMiddle AgedRe-EpithelializationSwedenTransdermal PatchTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomFibrin

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.