Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30243111›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2018

Temporal lobe epilepsy affects spatial organization of entorhinal cortex connectivity.

Taylor Kuhn, Joseph M Gullett, Angelique E Boutzoukas, Anastasia Bohsali, Thomas H Mareci, David B FitzGerald, Paul R Carney, Russell M Bauer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Taylor KuhnDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America. Electronic address: tkuhn@phhp.ufl.edu.
Joseph M GullettDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; Department of VA Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcolm Randall VA Center Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Angelique E BoutzoukasDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Anastasia BohsaliDepartment of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Thomas H MareciDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
David B FitzGeraldDepartment of VA Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcolm Randall VA Center Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Paul R CarneyDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; Department of Neurology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; Department of Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; J. Crayton Pruitt Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; B.J. and Eve Wilder Epilepsy Center Excellence, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Russell M BauerDepartment of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America; Department of VA Brain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcolm Randall VA Center Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Malcom Randall VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Florida Health · US

Funding

Bioengineering Research Partnership in Brain DynamicsR01EB002089 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CARNEY, PAUL · 2003 to 2005
$2.7M
Direct functional imaging of electrical brain stimulationR01NS077004 · NINDS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI SADLEIR, ROSALIND J · 2014 to 2017
$1.8M
In vivo imaging of therapeutic electric current flowR21NS081646 · NINDS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI SADLEIR, ROSALIND J · 2014 to 2015
$410k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002089NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS077004NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS081646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence for structural connectivity patterns within the medial temporal lobe derives primarily from postmortem histological studies. In humans and nonhuman primates, the parahippocampal gyrus (PHg) is subdivided into parahippocampal (PHc) and perirhinal (PRc) cortices, which receive input from distinct cortical networks. Likewise, their efferent projections to the entorhinal cortex (ERc) are distinct. The PHc projects primarily to the medial ERc (M-ERc). The PRc projects primarily to the lateral portion of the ERc (L-ERc). Both M-ERc and L-ERc, via the perforant pathway, project to the dentate gyrus and hippocampal (HC) subfields. Until recently, these neural circuits could not be visualized in vivo. Diffusion tensor imaging algorithms have been developed to segment gray matter structures based on probabilistic connectivity patterns. However, these algorithms have not yet been applied to investigate connectivity in the temporal lobe or changes in connectivity architecture related to disease processes. In this study, this segmentation procedure was used to classify ERc gray matter based on PRc, ERc, and HC connectivity patterns in 7 patients with temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) without hippocampal sclerosis (mean age, 14.86 ± 3.34 years) and 7 healthy controls (mean age, 23.86 ± 2.97 years). Within samples paired t-tests allowed for comparison of ERc connectivity between epileptogenic and contralateral hemispheres. In healthy controls, there were no significant within-group differences in surface area, volume, or cluster number of ERc connectivity-defined regions (CDR). Likewise, in line with histology results, ERc CDR in the control group were well-organized, uniform, and segregated via PRc/PHc afferent and HC efferent connections. Conversely, in TLE, there were significantly more PRc and HC CDR clusters in the epileptogenic than the contralateral hemisphere. The surface area of the PRc CDR was greater, and that of the HC CDRs was smaller, in the epileptogenic hemisphere as well. Further, there was no clear delineation between M-ERc and L-ERc connectivity with PRc, PHc or HC in TLE. These results suggest a breakdown of the spatial organization of PHg-ERc-HC connectivity in TLE. Whether this breakdown is the cause or result of epileptic activity remains an exciting research question.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAlgorithmsCase-Control StudiesChildDiffusion Tensor ImagingEntorhinal CortexEpilepsy, Temporal LobeFemaleGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleWhite MatterYoung AdultDTIMedial temporal lobeMRITemporal lobe epilepsyTractographyWhite matter

Identifiers

PMID30243111
PMCPMC6294293
OpenAlexW2889928400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.