ArticleMicroscopy research and technique2018
Molecular imaging with neural training of identification algorithm (neural network localization identification).
Article in Microscopy research and technique, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Could artificial intelligence revolutionize the development of nanovectors for gene therapy and mRNA vaccines?Nano today · 2022Article
- Democratising deep learning for microscopy with ZeroCostDL4Mic.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Deep learning-based point-scanning super-resolution imaging.Nature methods · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Superresolution localization microscopy strongly relies on robust identification algorithms for accurate reconstruction of the biological systems it is used to measure. The fields of machine learning and computer vision have provided promising solutions for automated object identification, but usually rely on well represented training sets to learn object features. However, using a static training set can result in the learned identification algorithm making mistakes on data that is not well represented by the training set. Here, we present a method for training an artificial neural network without providing a training set in advance. This method uses the data to be analyzed, and the fitting algorithm to train an artificial neural network tailored to that data set. We show that the same artificial neural network can learn to identify at least two types of molecular emissions: the regular point spread functions (PSFs), and the astigmatism PSF. Simulations indicate that this method can be extremely reliable in extracting molecular emission signatures. Additionally, we implemented the artificial neural network calculation to be performed on a graphics processing unit (GPU) for massively parallelized calculation which drastically reduces the time required for the identification process. By implementing the neural identification on a GPU, we allow this method of identification to be used in a real time analysis algorithm. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS: Here, we present a machine learning algorithm for identifying point-spread functions without the need for an a priori training set. We show that this method can detect over 90% of molecules with less than 1% false positive identification in simulations. We further show that because this algorithm does not make assumptions of about the shape of molecular emission, it is compatible with models beyond the symmetric 2D Gaussian.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.