ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2019
The potential for citizen science to produce reliable and useful information in ecology.
Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Biases in butterfly survey effort and patterns of protocol used across biogeographic regions.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026Review
- Quality Assurance Framework for the Design, Collection and Curation of Standard Data Products From a Distributed Ecology Network.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Community Science: Big Insights From Small Mammal Data.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Citizen science provides insights on pollination services in urban community gardens.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Citizen science in plant disease surveillance.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Occupancy estimation of wild species in a palm oil plantation using unstructured data.PloS one · 2026Article
- Connecting the dots: integrating citizen science, ecology, and habitat change for the conservation of three Leporidae species in the central mountains of Mexico.Die Naturwissenschaften · 2025Article
- Beautifully dangerous or dangerously beautiful: perceptions of southern African pythons (Python natalensis) in southern African rural and urban areas.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2025Article
- Recycle and reuse: an ethological perspective for citizen science data on Lucanus cervus (Coleoptera: Lucanidae).Journal of insect science (Online) · 2025Article
- Estimating the Abundance of Widely Distributed Primates.American journal of primatology · 2025Review
- The records from citizen science of an "endemic" agouti are not thoroughly evaluated nor examined.BMC research notes · 2025Article
- Integrating data to assess occupancy patterns of an endangered bumble bee.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025Article
- The influence of native shrub density on bird communities in the southern drylands of California, USA.BMC ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- The academic impact of Open Science: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2025Review
- Protected insect species in Italy: occurrence data from a 10-year citizen science initiative.Biodiversity data journal · 2025Article
- Estimating Accessibility Problems in the Swedish Housing Stock Using Citizen Science: The Housing Experiment 2021.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025Article
- The city nature challenge: A global citizen science phenomenon contributing to biodiversity knowledge and informing local government practices.Bioscience · 2024Article
- Marine Citizen Science and the Conservation of Mediterranean Corals: The Relevance of Training, Expert Validation, and Robust Sampling Protocols.Environmental management · 2024Article
- Deep learning in terrestrial conservation biology.Biologia futura · 2023Review
- Spatiotemporal and Individual Patterns of Domestic Cat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We examined features of citizen science that influence data quality, inferential power, and usefulness in ecology. As background context for our examination, we considered topics such as ecological sampling (probability based, purposive, opportunistic), linkage between sampling technique and statistical inference (design based, model based), and scientific paradigms (confirmatory, exploratory). We distinguished several types of citizen science investigations, from intensive research with rigorous protocols targeting clearly articulated questions to mass-participation internet-based projects with opportunistic data collection lacking sampling design, and examined overarching objectives, design, analysis, volunteer training, and performance. We identified key features that influence data quality: project objectives, design and analysis, and volunteer training and performance. Projects with good designs, trained volunteers, and professional oversight can meet statistical criteria to produce high-quality data with strong inferential power and therefore are well suited for ecological research objectives. Projects with opportunistic data collection, little or no sampling design, and minimal volunteer training are better suited for general objectives related to public education or data exploration because reliable statistical estimation can be difficult or impossible. In some cases, statistically robust analytical methods, external data, or both may increase the inferential power of certain opportunistically collected data. Ecological management, especially by government agencies, frequently requires data suitable for reliable inference. With standardized protocols, state-of-the-art analytical methods, and well-supervised programs, citizen science can make valuable contributions to conservation by increasing the scope of species monitoring efforts. Data quality can be improved by adhering to basic principles of data collection and analysis, designing studies to provide the data quality required, and including suitable statistical expertise, thereby strengthening the science aspect of citizen science and enhancing acceptance by the scientific community and decision makers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.