Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242907›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2019

The potential for citizen science to produce reliable and useful information in ecology.

Eleanor D Brown, Byron K Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Biases in butterfly survey effort and patterns of protocol used across biogeographic regions.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Citizen science in plant disease surveillance.Frontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Estimating the Abundance of Widely Distributed Primates.American journal of primatology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Integrating data to assess occupancy patterns of an endangered bumble bee.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Estimating Accessibility Problems in the Swedish Housing Stock Using Citizen Science: The Housing Experiment 2021.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Spatiotemporal and Individual Patterns of Domestic Cat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Eleanor D BrownScience and Decisions Center, U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA, 20192, U.S.A.ORCID 0000-0001-7798-830X
Byron K WilliamsThe Wildlife Society, 5410 Grosvenor Lane, Suite 200, Bethesda, MD, 20814, U.S.A.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined features of citizen science that influence data quality, inferential power, and usefulness in ecology. As background context for our examination, we considered topics such as ecological sampling (probability based, purposive, opportunistic), linkage between sampling technique and statistical inference (design based, model based), and scientific paradigms (confirmatory, exploratory). We distinguished several types of citizen science investigations, from intensive research with rigorous protocols targeting clearly articulated questions to mass-participation internet-based projects with opportunistic data collection lacking sampling design, and examined overarching objectives, design, analysis, volunteer training, and performance. We identified key features that influence data quality: project objectives, design and analysis, and volunteer training and performance. Projects with good designs, trained volunteers, and professional oversight can meet statistical criteria to produce high-quality data with strong inferential power and therefore are well suited for ecological research objectives. Projects with opportunistic data collection, little or no sampling design, and minimal volunteer training are better suited for general objectives related to public education or data exploration because reliable statistical estimation can be difficult or impossible. In some cases, statistically robust analytical methods, external data, or both may increase the inferential power of certain opportunistically collected data. Ecological management, especially by government agencies, frequently requires data suitable for reliable inference. With standardized protocols, state-of-the-art analytical methods, and well-supervised programs, citizen science can make valuable contributions to conservation by increasing the scope of species monitoring efforts. Data quality can be improved by adhering to basic principles of data collection and analysis, designing studies to provide the data quality required, and including suitable statistical expertise, thereby strengthening the science aspect of citizen science and enhancing acceptance by the scientific community and decision makers.

Indexed as

Citizen ScienceConservation of Natural ResourcesData AccuracyEcologyHumansVolunteerscalidad de datosciencia ecológicadata qualitydiseño de proyectosecological scienceproject designvoluntariosvolunteers志愿者数据质量生态科学项目设计

Identifiers

PMID30242907
PMCPMC7754136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.