Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242827›Full record

ArticleActa psychiatrica Scandinavica2018

Long-term cognitive trajectories and heterogeneity in patients with schizophrenia and their unaffected siblings.

Md A Islam, T D Habtewold, F D van Es, P J Quee, E R van den Heuvel, B Z Alizadeh, R Bruggeman, GROUP Investigators

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Association of clinical symptoms and cardiometabolic dysregulations in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. MICEmi: A method to identify cognitive endophenotypes of mental illnesses.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2022
    Review
  16. A subtype of institutionalized patients with schizophrenia characterized by pronounced subcortical and cognitive deficits.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Md A IslamUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.
T D HabtewoldUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4476-518X
F D van EsUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.
P J QueeUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.
E R van den HeuvelUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
B Z AlizadehUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1415-8007
R BruggemanUniversity of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, University Center for Psychiatry, Rob Giel Research Center, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3238-8471
GROUP Investigators

Funding

AstraZenecaDutch Health Research Council (Zon-Mw) 10-000-1001Eli LillyGraduates School of Medical Science, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands 10-000-1001Janssen CilagLundbeck
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the heterogeneity and stability of cognition in patients with a non-affective psychotic disorder and their unaffected siblings. In addition, we aimed to predict the cognitive subtypes of siblings by their probands.

methodAssessments were conducted at baseline, 3 and 6 years in 1119 patients, 1059 siblings and 586 controls from the Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis (GROUP) study. Group-based trajectory modeling was applied to identify trajectories and clustered multinomial logistic regression analysis was used for prediction modeling. A composite score of eight neurocognitive tests was used to measure cognitive performance.

resultsFive stable cognitive trajectories ranging from severely altered to high cognitive performance were identified in patients. Likewise, four stable trajectories ranging from moderately altered to high performance were found in siblings. Siblings had a higher risk of cognitive alteration when patients' alteration was mild (OR = 2.21), moderate (OR = 5.70), and severe (OR = 10.07) compared with patients with intact cognitive function. The familial correlation coefficient between pairs of index patients and their siblings was 0.27 (P = 0.003).

conclusionsThe cognitive profiles identified in the current study might be suitable as endophenotypes and could be used in future genetic studies and predicting functional and clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

SiblingsAdultCognitive DysfunctionEndophenotypesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleModels, StatisticalPsychotic DisordersSchizophreniaYoung Adultcognitioncognitive impairmentpsychosisschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID30242827
PMCPMC6220939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.