Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242807›Full record

ArticleBosnian journal of basic medical sciences2019

Prediction of breast cancer metastasis risk using circulating tumor markers: A follow-up study.

Sibel Cetintas, Gulcin Tezcan, Berrin Tunca, Unal Egeli, Mustafa Sehsuvar Gokgoz, Gulsah Cecener

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bosnian journal of basic medical sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sibel CetintasRadiation Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey. skahraman@uludag.edu.tr.
Gulcin Tezcan
Berrin Tunca
Unal Egeli
Mustafa Sehsuvar Gokgoz
Gulsah Cecener
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ · TRKazan Federal University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distant organ tumor dissemination is a major cause of breast cancer-related deaths. In 2010, we analyzed the prognostic importance of the circulating tumor markers (CTMs) cytokeratin 19 (CK19), CK20, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in relation to the clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with breast cancer (BC). To assess the clinical utility of CK19, CK20 and EGFR in predicting distant metastasis in BC, here we report 7-year follow-up results of 77 patients. The patients with at least one positive CTM were classified as CTM(+) and those negative for all CTMs were assigned to CTM(-) group. In patients who received no treatment following CTM analysis, 25.0% had metastasis in CTM(+) and 10.0% in CTM(-) group. In patients who received one of the following therapies: chemotherapy, radiotherapy or hormone therapy, or the combinations of these therapies, the rate of metastasis was 33.3% in CTM(+) and 20.0% in CTM(-) group. Disease-free time was shorter in CTM(+) patients compared to CTM(-) group (28.83 ± 10.76 and 41.38 ± 9.5 months, respectively). According to multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis, the presence of regional lymph node metastasis, Ki-67 expression, higher tumor grade and CTM expression status were predictors of poor prognosis associated with distant metastasis (p < 0.05). Also, CTM positivity was a factor associated with metastasis-related poor prognosis (HR = 0.492, p = 0.026). The mean survival for CTM(+) patients was shorter than that for CTM(-) patients (90.671 ± 2.66 and 101.23 ± 3.92 months, respectively; p > 0.05). Our findings demonstrate that CTM positivity may indicate a high metastasis risk; however, CTM negativity does not guarantee low metastasis risk. These results may encourage further preclinical investigation of CTMs, to evaluate the possible implications of these findings to the clinical setting.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression ProfilingHormonesHumansKeratin-19Keratin-20Middle AgedBiomarkers, TumorEGFR protein, humanERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesErbB ReceptorsHormonesKeratin-19Keratin-20KRT19 protein, humanKRT20 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID30242807
PMCPMC6535389
OpenAlexW2891963575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.