Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242576›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2018

Evaluation of dynamic change in regenerated tendons in a mouse model.

Yoshinori Ohashi, Junsuke Nakase, Kengo Shimozaki, Kojun Torigoe, Hiroyuki Tsuchiya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Growth Factor Roles in Soft Tissue Physiology and Pathophysiology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yoshinori OhashiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Junsuke NakaseDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan. nakase1007@yahoo.co.jp.
Kengo ShimozakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.
Kojun TorigoeDepartment of Rehabilitation, Fukui Health Science University Faculty of Health Science, Fukui, Japan.
Hiroyuki TsuchiyaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUsing the film model method, the process whereby a substance called tendon gel is secreted from transected tendon ends and changed into a tendon after application of a traction force is known. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between mechanical properties in the early stages of tendon regeneration and time by using the film model method.

methodAdult male ddY mice, closed colony mice established and maintained in Japan, were prepared for each experimental group. The study animals were 30 mice and were divided into three groups of 10 mice each. Ten specimens of tendon gel secreted from the transected tendon ends were collected on days 10, 15, and 20 postoperatively. While a traction force of 0.00245 N was applied to these specimens, the process of tendon gel changing into a tendon was video recorded for 24 h, and the length of extension was measured over time. Regenerated tendons were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological examination. Healing site was studied histologically according to the our maturity score with reference to the Bonar's scale.

resultsThe day 10 specimens gradually stretched for 12 h after the start of pulling and transformed into tendons. In contrast, the day 15 and 20 specimens stretched immediately after the start of pulling and transformed into tendons. The day 10 specimens stretched significantly more than the day 15 and 20 specimens (mechanical strain; 0.43 ± 0.26%, 0.03 ± 0.02%, and 0.03 ± 0.01%, respectively)Statistically significant differences were observed in the day 10 specimens than in the day 15 and 20 specimens. (P < 0.017). Using our maturity scores, the day 15 and 20 specimens were more mature than the day 10 specimens. (1.6 ± 0.68, 3.9 ± 0.54, and 4.8 ± 0.64, respectively) Statistically significant differences were observed in the day 10 specimens than in the day 15 and 20 specimens (P < 0.017).

conclusionTendon gel physiologically and histologically matures on or after day 15 and becomes stronger dynamically in mechanical strength after day 15 than after day 10.

Indexed as

Film model methodIntrinsic healingTendon gelTendon regenerationTraction force

Identifiers

PMID30242576
PMCPMC6150864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.