Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242476›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastroenterology2019

Tumor-specific genetic aberrations in cell-free DNA of gastroesophageal cancer patients.

Kristina Magaard Koldby, Michael Bau Mortensen, Sönke Detlefsen, Per Pfeiffer, Mads Thomassen, Torben A Kruse

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastroenterology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Novel biomarkers for early detection of gastric cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A Review of Circulating Tumor DNA in the Diagnosis and Monitoring of Esophageal Cancer.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristina Magaard KoldbyDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense, Denmark. Kristina.Koldby@rsyd.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1951-5736
Michael Bau MortensenDepartment of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense, Denmark.
Sönke DetlefsenDepartment of Pathology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 15, Odense, Denmark.
Per PfeifferDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense, Denmark.
Mads ThomassenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense, Denmark.
Torben A KruseDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Odense University Hospital, J.B. Winsløws Vej 4, Odense, Denmark.
Odense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The applicability of liquid biopsies is studied intensively in all types of cancer and analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has recently been implemented clinically for mutation detection in lung cancer. ctDNA may provide information about tumor quantity and mutations present in the tumor, and as such have many potential applications in diagnosis and treatment of cancer. It has been suggested that ctDNA analysis may overcome the issue of intra-tumor heterogeneity faced by tissue biopsies and serve as an additional diagnostic tool. Furthermore, liquid biopsies are potentially helpful for monitoring of treatment response as well as detection of minimal residual disease and relapse. Gastroesophageal cancers (GEC) have high mortality rates and the majority of patients present with advanced stage at diagnosis or succumb due to disease recurrence even after radical resection of the primary tumor. Biomarkers that can help optimize treatment strategy are thus highly desirable. The present study is a review of published data on ctDNA in GEC patients. We identified 25 studies in which tumor-specific genetic aberrations were investigated in plasma or serum and discuss these in relation to the methods applied for ctDNA analysis. The methods used for ctDNA detection greatly influence the sensitivity of the analysis and, therefore, the potential clinical applications. We found that studies of ctDNA in GEC, although limited in number, are promising for several applications such as genetic profiling of tumors and monitoring of disease progression. However, more studies are needed to establish if and how this analysis can be clinically implemented.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADNA Mutational AnalysisEsophageal NeoplasmsHumansLiquid BiopsyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm, ResidualStomach NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNABiomarkerCell-free DNACirculating tumor DNAEsophageal cancerGastric cancer

Identifiers

PMID30242476
OpenAlexW2890426065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.