ArticleOecologia2018
Temporal patterns of ungulate herbivory and phenology of aspen regeneration and defense.
Article in Oecologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Populus salicinoids: a thriving subfield in the omics era.Tree physiology · 2025Review
- Brandt's vole (Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Phenotypic Variation in Phytochemical Defense of Trembling Aspen in Western North America: Genetics, Development, and Geography.Journal of chemical ecology · 2023Article
- Sheep feeding preference as a tool to control pine invasion in Patagonia: influence of foliar toughness, terpenoids and resin content.Scientific reports · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ungulate herbivory can create strong top-down effects on forest recruitment, especially after fire. Defense strategies of tree species against ungulate herbivory include escape through vertical growth and resistance through the production of defense compounds. Using a four-way fence design and camera traps we characterized the differential impacts of ungulate herbivores (deer, elk, cattle) on aspen forest recruitment and plant defense responses and how they vary depending on the timing of herbivory. Aspen height growth was greatest between June and August and ungulate use of aspen was highest in July and August. Three years after fire, height of aspen differed among fence treatments with full ungulate exclusion > deer-only plots > native ungulate plots > fenceless plots: 108 ± 4 cm, 94 ± 4 cm, 89 ± 4 cm, and 65 ± 4 cm, respectively. Fenceless plots had the highest rates of removal of apical meristems by the end of 2014 and 2015 (61% and 53%, respectively). Native ungulate plots, and deer-only plots both had similar removal of apical meristems in 2014 (37% and 39%, respectively). The highest phenolic glycoside concentrations were associated with an 80% reduction in meristem removal and four-fold greater aspen height by the end of summer. Low nitrogen was associated with an 86% reduction in apical meristem removal and threefold greater aspen height. In conclusion, our study suggests that high ungulate abundance can have detrimental impacts on forest recruitment and that high aspen defense chemistry and lower leaf N deters ungulate herbivory, especially in the late summer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30242473What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.