Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242470›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2018

Flutter sensitivity in FM bats. Part II: amplitude modulation.

A Leonie Baier, Kristin-Jasmin Stelzer, Lutz Wiegrebe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

A Leonie BaierDepartment Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany. baier@orn.mpg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-0327-0378
Kristin-Jasmin StelzerDepartment Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.
Lutz WiegrebeDepartment Biology II, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, Großhaderner Str. 2, 82152, Martinsried, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9289-6187

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bats use echolocation to detect targets such as insect prey. The echolocation call of frequency-modulating bats (FM bats) typically sweeps through a broad range of frequencies within a few milliseconds. The large bandwidth grants the bat high spatial acuity in depicting the target. However, the extremely short call duration and the overall low duty cycle of call emission impair the bat's capability to detect e.g. target movement. Nonetheless, FM bats constitute more than 80% of all echolocating species and are able to navigate and forage in an environment full of moving targets. We used an auditory virtual reality approach to generate changes in echo amplitude reflective of fluttering insect wings independently from other confounding parameters. We show that the FM bat Phyllostomus discolor successfully detected these modulations in echo amplitude and that their performance increased with the rate of the modulation, mimicking faster insect wing-beats. The ability of FM bats to detect amplitude modulations of echoes suggests a release from the trade-off between spatial and temporal acuity and highlights the diversity of selective pressures working on the echolocation system of bats.

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAnimalsChiropteraDiscrimination, PsychologicalEcholocationInsectaMaleMotor ActivityPredatory BehaviorPsychometricsUser-Computer InterfaceWings, AnimalBiosonarEcholocationSAMVirtual targetWagon-wheel effect

Identifiers

PMID30242470
PMCPMC6208682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.