ArticleWorld journal of surgery2019
A Propensity Score-matched Comparison Study of Surgical Outcomes in Patients with Differentiated Thyroid Cancer After Robotic Versus Open Total Thyroidectomy.
Article in World journal of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Oncologic outcomes and surgical completeness of remote-access thyroidectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Comparison of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy and open thyroidectomy for papillary thyroid carcinoma.Journal of robotic surgery · 2023Pooled it
- Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Thyroid Surgery - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Pooled it
- Surgical safety and effectiveness of bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic thyroidectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngologyPooled it
- A prospective, randomized controlled study of the safety and efficacy of gasless bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) robotic thyroidectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2020Trial
- Not all patients need a robot: comparative perioperative outcomes of robotic BABA versus endoscopic CABBA thyroid lobectomy with ipsilateral central lymph node dissection, stratified by body mass index.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Patient expectations and concerns regarding robotic thyroidectomy in china: a cross-sectional study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Retrospective observational study between robotic thyroidectomy via bilateral axillo-breast approach and conventional open surgery for thyroid cancer.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
- Detailed analysis of learning phases and outcomes in robotic and endoscopic thyroidectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Review
- Recent Advances in the Surgical Management of Thyroid Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Comparison of the Postoperative Outcomes of the Mini-Flap Bilateral Axillo-Breast Approach (BABA) and Conventional BABA Robot-Assisted Thyroidectomy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Quality of life and surgical outcome of ABBA versus EndoCATS endoscopic thyroid surgery: a single center experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Rare case of postoperative mediastinitis following thyroidectomy.Korean journal of clinical oncology · 2021Article
- Robotic Completion Thyroidectomy via the Bilateral Axillo-Breast Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Unilateral axilla-bilateral areola approach for thyroidectomy by da Vinci robotGland surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe aim of this study, from a surgical, oncological, and functional perspective, was to identify whether bilateral axillo-breast approach robotic total thyroidectomy (RTT) for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) has different surgical outcomes compared to open total thyroidectomy (OTT).
methodsInitially, 796 patients who underwent total thyroidectomy were primarily reviewed and 178 who were ineligible for analysis were excluded. Propensity score matching analysis adjusted for clinicopathological characteristics (sex, age, body mass index, extent of central node dissection, tumor size, extrathyroidal extension, and thyroiditis) was conducted, with 246 patients in the OTT group matched with 123 patients in the RTT group.
resultsThere were no significant differences in surgical outcomes in terms of surgical safety and oncological safety between the OTT and RTT groups, except in mean operation times (123.51 ± 32.63 vs. 198.39 ± 37.93 min, respectively; P < 0.001). However, the median parathyroid and laryngeal function recovery times were shorter in the RTT group than in the OTT group [88 ± 33.09 (95% CI: 23.148-152.852) vs. 100 ± 16.20 (95% CI: 68.242-131.768) days; P = 0.044 and 87 ± 32.40 (95% CI: 23.489-150.511) vs. 118 ± 49.50 (95% CI: 20.985-215.015) days; P = 0.002].
conclusionsThe recovery times of laryngeal and parathyroid function were significantly shorter in RTT patients than in OTT patients for DTC. To verify a definitive conclusion about the superiority of robotic total thyroidectomy in terms of parathyroid and laryngeal function recovery, further studies may be necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30242457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.