Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242455›Full record

ReviewKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Allograft tendons are a safe and effective option for revision ACL reconstruction: a clinical review.

V Condello, U Zdanowicz, Berardo Di Matteo, T Spalding, P E Gelber, P Adravanti, P Heuberer, S Dimmen, B Sonnery-Cottet, C Hulet and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Influence of Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm on the mechanical strength of soft tissue allograft.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

V CondelloDepartment of Orthopaedics, Clinica Humanitas Castelli, Via Mazzini, 11, Bergamo, Italy.
U ZdanowiczCarolina Medical Center, Pory 78, 02-757, Warsaw, Poland.
Berardo Di MatteoDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Manzoni 113, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy. berardo.dimatteo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9807-0271
T SpaldingUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire (UHCW), Coventry, UK.
P E GelberOrthopaedic Department, ICATME-Institut Universitari Quirón-Dexeus, Universitat Autònoma Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
P AdravantiU.O. Ortopedia, Clinica "Città di Parma", Parma, Italy.
P HeubererHerz-Jesu Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
S DimmenLovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Lovisenberggt. 17, 0456, Oslo, Norway.
B Sonnery-CottetCentre Orthopédique Santy, FIFA Medical Centre of Excellence, Groupe Ramsay-Générale de Santé, Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz, Lyon, France.
C HuletDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, Unit INSERM COMETE, UMR U1075, Caen University Hospital, Caen, France.
M BonomoOrthopaedic Department, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria Hospital, Via Don A. Sempreboni, 5, 37024, Negrar, VR, Italy.
E KonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Via Manzoni 113, Rozzano, 20089, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains a challenge, especially optimising outcome for patients with a compromised knee where previous autogenous tissue has been used for reconstruction. Allograft tissue has become a recognized choice of graft for revision surgery but questions remain over the risks and benefits of such an option. Allograft tendons are a safe and effective option for revision ACL reconstruction with no higher risk of infection and equivalent failure rates compared to autografts provided that the tissue is not irradiated, or any irradiation is minimal. Best scenarios for use of allografts include revision surgery where further use of autografts could lead to high donor site morbidity, complex instability situations where additional structures may need reconstruction, and in those with clinical and radiologic signs of autologous tendon degeneration. A surgeon needs to be able to select the best option for the challenging knee facing revision ACL reconstruction, and in the light of current data, allograft tissue can be considered a suitable option to this purpose.Level of evidence IV.

Indexed as

AllograftsAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionReoperationHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CareReturn to SportSpecimen HandlingSterilizationTendonsACLAllograftAnterior cruciate ligamentArthroscopyMulti-ligamentReturn to sportRevision

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.