Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242439›Full record

ArticleCurrent microbiology2018

Assessment of the Detrimental Impact of Polyvalent Streptophages Intended to be Used as Biological Control Agents on Beneficial Soil Streptoflora.

Nina R Ashfield-Crook, Zachary Woodward, Martin Soust, D İpek Kurtböke

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nina R Ashfield-CrookGeneCology Research Centre and the Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD, 4558, Australia.
Zachary WoodwardTerragen Biotech Pty. Ltd., Level 5, 171 Collins Street, PO Box 24082, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia.
Martin SoustTerragen Biotech Pty. Ltd., Level 5, 171 Collins Street, PO Box 24082, Melbourne, VIC, 3001, Australia.
D İpek KurtbökeGeneCology Research Centre and the Faculty of Science, Health, Education and Engineering, University of the Sunshine Coast, Maroochydore DC, QLD, 4558, Australia. ikurtbok@usc.edu.au.
University of the Sunshine Coast · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Streptophages are currently being investigated to control potato common scab, however, since a majority of streptophages are reported to be polyvalent, their potential to infect beneficial soil streptomycetes during the application process may have unintended consequences. To test this hypothesis, two phytopathogenic fungi, namely Fusarium solani and Rhizoctonia solani, were tested for their detrimental effect on the test crop wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Gutha). F. solani caused a significant root weight reduction (34%) in the wheat plant and therefore was tested further in the pot trials with actinomycetes present. Sixty-seven streptomycete isolates from a Tasmanian potato farm were screened for their antifungal abilities against the two phytopathogenic fungi. Four actinomycetes found to be strongly antifungal were then tested for their disease-protective abilities against F. solani in pot trials again using wheat. Addition of the streptomycetes into the container media protected the plants against F. solani, indicating that streptomycetes have a disease-suppressive effect. A further pot trial was conducted to evaluate whether these beneficial streptomycete species would be affected by streptophage treatment and subsequently result in an increased risk of fungal infections. When streptophages were added to the pots, the shoot and root growth of wheat declined by 23.6% and 8.0%, respectively, in the pots with the pathogenic fungus compared to the control pots. These differences might suggest that removal of antifungal streptomycetes by polyvalent phages from plant rhizosphere when biocontrol of plant pathogenic streptomycetes (e.g. Streptomyces scabiei) is targeted might encourage secondary fungal infections in the farm environment. The presented data provide preliminary evidence that streptophage treatment of pathogenic streptomycetes may lead to an aggravated disease risk by soil-borne fungal pathogens when naturally present antagonists are removed. As a result, extensive farm site trials are required to determine the long-term detrimental impact of polyvalent streptophage treatments on beneficial soil streptoflora.

Indexed as

ActinobacteriaAntifungal AgentsBiological Control AgentsFusariumPlant DiseasesPlant RootsRhizoctoniaRhizosphereSoilSoil MicrobiologyStreptomycesTriticumAntifungal AgentsBiological Control AgentsSoil

Identifiers

PMID30242439
OpenAlexW2890721249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.