ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2019
[Surgical treatment options for cervical paragangliomas].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retrospective, multicenter study of surgical treatment for carotid body tumors with or without preoperative embolization.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Low red blood cell predicts high risk of temporary postoperative complications after carotid body tumor surgical resection.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Rare Diseases of the Oral Cavity, Neck, and Pharynx.Laryngo- rhino- otologie · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The therapies available for the rare tumor entity of cervical paraganglioma (PG) are currently undergoing a paradigm shift. The treatment of choice for small carotid body tumors, malignant and active endocrine tumors is surgical resection; however, for locally advanced carotid body tumors and vagal PG, surgical therapy should be critically evaluated. Due to the immediate proximity of these hypervascularized tumors to the caudal cranial nerves, there is a risk of severe nerve damage with a significant impairment of quality of life after resection, particularly for locally advanced cervical PG, emphasizing further the importance of a restrictive surgical strategy. External radiotherapy can provide an equivalent primary therapeutic option with respect to the rate of recurrence and is accompanied by a lower morbidity. The slow rate of tumor progression and the multifocality of the familial variant of cervical PG or significant comorbidities in older, asymptomatic patients warrant a less aggressive treatment strategy for these tumors. When a wait and scan approach is implemented, a closely monitored radiological and clinical re-evaluation is of upmost importance. In a multidisciplinary approach the following critical points require consideration before a therapy is implemented,: size and location of the tumor, progression rate, genetic background, patient age and general condition, relevant comorbidities, the presence of synchronous PG and/or vasoactive catecholamine-producing tumors. Although best practice algorithms for the treatment of cervical PG have already been devised, recent innovative developments have led to more patient-tailored, individualized treatment approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.