ReviewPediatric radiology2018
Allergic-like contrast media reaction management in children.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- How young radiologists use contrast media and manage adverse reactions: an international survey.Insights into imaging · 2024Article
- Knowledge assessment of radiologists, radiology residents, and radiographers regarding contrast materials and management of adverse drug reactions occurring due to contrast materials: a cross-sectional study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2023Article
- Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the neonatal brain.Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
- Safety issues related to intravenous contrast agent use in magnetic resonance imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2021Review
- Safety of gadoterate meglumine in children younger than 2 years of age.Pediatric radiology · 2020Article
- Letter to the Editor: how to document adverse reactions induced by gadolinium based contrast agents? A plea for type A and type B reactions.European radiology · 2020Article
- Intravenous gadolinium-based hepatocyte-specific contrast agents (HSCAs) for contrast-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients: what the radiologist should know.Pediatric radiology · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of contrast materials as part of imaging examinations is common in children of all ages, as these compounds increase image contrast, lesion detection and lesion characterization. Though modern iodinated, gadolinium-based and ultrasound microbubble contrast materials generally are quite safe, acute physiological and allergic-like reactions are possible. The majority of acute contrast reactions in children are mild and self-limited; however, life-threatening reactions can occur. It is our obligation as radiologists to recognize and manage these adverse reactions. The objective of this article is to review the frequency, manifestations and appropriate treatment of acute contrast reactions in the pediatric population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30242426What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.