Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242313›Full record

ArticleJAMA facial plastic surgery2018

Association of Hair Loss With Health Utility Measurements Before and After Hair Transplant Surgery in Men and Women.

Nicholas B Abt, Olivia Quatela, Alyssa Heiser, Nate Jowett, Oren Tessler, Linda N Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA facial plastic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Research advances on autologous hair transplantation in the treatment of secondary cicatricail alopecia].Zhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas B AbtDepartment of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Olivia QuatelaDivision of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Alyssa HeiserDivision of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Nate JowettDivision of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Oren TesslerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Louisiana State University School of Medicine, New Orleans.
Linda N LeeDepartment of Otolaryngology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Harvard Medical School, Boston.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USLouisiana State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceAndrogenetic alopecia is a highly prevalent condition across both sexes and can be surgically corrected through hair transplant. Health utility scores, which represent quantitative estimates of individual preferences for a given state of health, are a measure of health-related quality of life. The health utility scores for sex-specific alopecia and the posttransplant state have not previously been quantified.

objectiveTo obtain health utility measurements for the objective assessment of sex-specific alopecia and hair transplant surgery and to analyze layperson perception of alopecia compared with other chronic health conditions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsA prospective clinical study was conducted from August 1 to December 31, 2017, at the Harvard Decision Science Laboratory. Adult casual observers (n = 308) completed an internet-based health utility questionnaire. Health states were presented using still patient images and a description of 5 health states, including monocular blindness, binocular blindness, male alopecia, female alopecia, and male posttransplant state. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Health utility measures of sex-specific alopecia, posttransplant state, and monocular and binocular blindness were measured by visual analog scale (VAS), standard gamble (SG), and time trade-off (TTO) in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Groups were analyzed with 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey pairwise comparison.

resultsThe 308 participants included 157 (51.0%) women with a mean (SD) age of 30.8 (13.5) years. Mean (SD) health utility measures included 0.85 (0.18) QALYs for the VAS, 0.93 (0.17) QALYs for the SG, and 0.93 (0.17) QALYs for the TTO in male alopecia; 0.83 (0.19) QALYs for the VAS, 0.92 (0.17) QALYs for the SG, and 0.91 (0.18) QALYs for the TTO in female alopecia; and 0.93 (0.11) QALYs for the VAS, 0.95 (0.15) QALYs for the SG, and 0.95 (0.16) QALYs for the TTO in a man in the posttransplant state. The mean (SD) health utility of monocular blindness was 0.76 (0.17) QALYs for the VAS, 0.87 (0.21) QALYs for the SG, and 0.86 (0.20) QALYs for the TTO. The health utility score for the posttransplant state was significantly improved compared with the health utility score for alopecia in both sexes (female VAS: +0.10 [95% CI, 0.06-0.14; P < .001]; male VAS, +0.08 [95% CI, 0.04-0.12; P < .001]). Hair loss in women and men demonstrated significantly lower QALYs on the VAS compared with the posttransplant state (female: -0.10 [95% CI, -0.14 to -0.06; P < .001]; male: -0.08 [95% CI, -0.12 to -0.04; P < .001]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Alopecia has a meaningful negative influence on health utility measures in both sexes. Hair transplant surgery significantly increases health utility measures compared with untreated alopecia in both sexes as rated among layperson observers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthHealth Status IndicatorsAdultAlopeciaFemaleHairHumansMaleProspective StudiesQuality-Adjusted Life YearsSurveys and QuestionnairesVisual Analog Scale

Identifiers

PMID30242313
PMCPMC6248210
OpenAlexW2892043210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.