Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242278›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

c-Kit

Mingyu Kwak, Ninche Ninche, Sabine Klein, Dieter Saur, Soosan Ghazizadeh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cancer therapy-related salivary dysfunction.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Bioengineering in salivary gland regeneration.Journal of biomedical science · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cell signaling regulation in salivary gland development.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mingyu KwakDepartment of Oral Biology & Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Ninche NincheDepartment of Oral Biology & Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Sabine KleinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany.
Dieter SaurDepartment of Internal Medicine, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany.
Soosan GhazizadehDepartment of Oral Biology & Pathology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA. soosan.ghazizadeh@stonybrook.edu.
Stony Brook University · USTechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

Regulation of salivary gland renewal and regenerationR21DE025925 · NIDCR · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI GHAZIZADEH, SOOSAN · 2017 to 2018
$433k
NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE025925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A rare population of salivary gland cells isolated based on c-Kit immunoreactivity are thought to represent tissue stem cells since they exhibit the most robust proliferative and differentiation capacity ex vivo. Despite their high promise for cell-based therapies aimed at restoring salivary function, the precise location and in vivo function of c-Kit

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell ProliferationFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitSalivary GlandsStem CellsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kit

Identifiers

PMID30242278
PMCPMC6155036
OpenAlexW2891683811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.