Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242260›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

In-vivo shift of the microbiota in oral biofilm in response to frequent sucrose consumption.

Annette Carola Anderson, Michael Rothballer, Markus Jörg Altenburger, Johan Peter Woelber, Lamprini Karygianni, Ilias Lagkouvardos, Elmar Hellwig, Ali Al-Ahmad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. SloR-SRE binding to theJournal of bacteriology · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Caries Etiology and Preventive Measures.European journal of dentistry · 2024
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Annette Carola AndersonDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs- University, Freiburg, Germany. annette.anderson@uniklinik-freiburg.de.ORCID 0000-0002-4489-1939
Michael RothballerInstitute of Network Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany.
Markus Jörg AltenburgerDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs- University, Freiburg, Germany.
Johan Peter WoelberDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs- University, Freiburg, Germany.
Lamprini KarygianniClinic of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Cariology, Center of Dental medicine, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Ilias LagkouvardosZIEL - Institute for Food and Health, Core Facility Microbiome/NGS, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9337-4033
Elmar HellwigDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs- University, Freiburg, Germany.
Ali Al-AhmadDepartment of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Faculty of Medicine, Albert-Ludwigs- University, Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) AL-1179/2-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caries is associated with shifts of microbiota in dental biofilms and primarily driven by frequent sucrose consumption. Data on environmentally induced in vivo microbiota shifts are scarce therefore we investigated the influence of frequent sucrose consumption on the oral biofilm. Splint systems containing enamel slabs were worn for 3 × 7 days with 7-day intervals to obtain oral biofilm samples. After a three-month dietary change of sucking 10 g of sucrose per day in addition to the regular diet, biofilm was obtained again at the end of the second phase. The microbiota was analysed using Illumina MiSeq amplicon sequencing (v1-v2 region). In addition, roughness of the enamel surface was measured with laser scanning microscopy. The sucrose phase resulted in significant differences in beta-diversity and significantly decreased species richness. It was marked by a significant increase in abundance of streptococci, specifically Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus parasanguinis and Streptococcus sanguinis. Enamel surface roughness began to increase, reflecting initial impairment of dental enamel surface. The results showed that frequent sucrose consumption provoked compositional changes in the microbiota, leading to an increase of non-mutans streptococci, hence supporting the extended ecological plaque hypothesis and emphasizing the synergy of multiple bacterial species in the development of caries.

Indexed as

AdultBiofilmsDental CariesDental EnamelDental PlaqueFemaleHumansMaleMicrobiotaMiddle AgedMouthStreptococcusSucroseYoung AdultSucrose

Identifiers

PMID30242260
PMCPMC6155074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.