Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242238›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of obesity (2005)2018

Can big data solve a big problem? Reporting the obesity data landscape in line with the Foresight obesity system map.

Michelle A Morris, Emma Wilkins, Kate A Timmins, Maria Bryant, Mark Birkin, Claire Griffiths

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of obesity (2005), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michelle A MorrisLeeds Institute for Data Analytics and School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. m.morris@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9325-619X
Emma WilkinsSchool of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS6 3QQ, UK.
Kate A TimminsSchool of Sport and Exercise Science, College of Social Science, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, LN6 7TS, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7643-7319
Maria BryantLeeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Mark BirkinLeeds Institute for Data Analytics and School of Geography, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
Claire GriffithsSchool of Sport, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS6 3QQ, UK.
University of Leeds · GBLeeds Beckett University · GBUniversity of Lincoln · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity research at a population level is multifaceted and complex. This has been characterised in the UK by the Foresight obesity systems map, identifying over 100 variables, across seven domain areas which are thought to influence energy balance, and subsequent obesity. Availability of data to consider the whole obesity system is traditionally lacking. However, in an era of big data, new possibilities are emerging. Understanding what data are available can be the first challenge, followed by an inconsistency in data reporting to enable adequate use in the obesity context. In this study we map data sources against the Foresight obesity system map domains and nodes and develop a framework to report big data for obesity research. Opportunities and challenges associated with this new data approach to whole systems obesity research are discussed.

methodsExpert opinion from the ESRC Strategic Network for Obesity was harnessed in order to develop a data source reporting framework for obesity research. The framework was then tested on a range of data sources. In order to assess availability of data sources relevant to obesity research, a data mapping exercise against the Foresight obesity systems map domains and nodes was carried out.

resultsA reporting framework was developed to recommend the reporting of key information in line with these headings: Background; Elements; Exemplars; Content; Ownership; Aggregation; Sharing; Temporality (BEE-COAST). The new BEE-COAST framework was successfully applied to eight exemplar data sources from the UK. 80% coverage of the Foresight obesity systems map is possible using a wide range of big data sources. The remaining 20% were primarily biological measurements often captured by more traditional laboratory based research.

conclusionsBig data offer great potential across many domains of obesity research and need to be leveraged in conjunction with traditional data for societal benefit and health promotion.

Indexed as

Big DataObesityBiomedical ResearchDatabases, FactualHumans

Identifiers

PMID30242238
PMCPMC6291418
OpenAlexW2889337827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.