Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242202›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2018

Brain responses to different types of salience in antipsychotic naïve first episode psychosis: An fMRI study.

Franziska Knolle, Anna O Ermakova, Azucena Justicia, Paul C Fletcher, Nico Bunzeck, Emrah Düzel, Graham K Murray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Neural Circuitry of Salience and Reward Processing in Psychosis.Biological psychiatry global open science · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Franziska KnolleDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. fk291@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9542-613X
Anna O ErmakovaUnit for Social & Community Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, East London NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1869-0084
Azucena JusticiaUnit for Social & Community Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, East London NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Paul C FletcherUnit for Social & Community Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, East London NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Nico BunzeckInstitute of Psychology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8834-450X
Emrah DüzelOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Institute of Cognitive Neurology and Dementia Research, Magdeburg, Germany.
Graham K MurrayBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0001354Medical Research Council G0701911Medical Research Council G1000183Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 093875/Z/10/ZWellcome Trust 095692Wellcome Trust 097814/Z/11
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abnormal salience processing has been suggested to contribute to the formation of positive psychotic symptoms in schizophrenia and related conditions. Previous research utilising reward learning or anticipation paradigms has demonstrated cortical and subcortical abnormalities in people with psychosis, specifically in the prefrontal cortex, the dopaminergic midbrain and the striatum. In these paradigms, reward prediction errors attribute motivational salience to stimuli. However, little is known about possible abnormalities across different forms of salience processing in psychosis patients, and whether any such abnormalities involve the dopaminergic midbrain. The aim of our study was, therefore, to investigate possible alterations in psychosis in neural activity in response to various forms of salience: novelty, negative emotion, targetness (task-driven salience) and rareness/deviance. We studied 14 antipsychotic naïve participants with first episode psychosis, and 37 healthy volunteers. During fMRI scanning, participants performed a visual oddball task containing these four forms of salience. Psychosis patients showed abnormally reduced signalling in the substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area (SN/VTA) for novelty, negative emotional salience and targetness; reduced striatal and occipital (lingual gyrus) signalling to novelty and negative emotional salience, reduced signalling in the amygdala, anterior cingulate cortex and parahippocamal gyrus to negative emotional salience, and reduced cerebellar signalling to novelty and negative emotional salience. Our results indicate alterations of several forms of salience processing in patients with psychosis in the midbrain SN/VTA, with additional subcortical and cortical regions also showing alterations in salience signalling, the exact pattern of alterations depending on the form of salience in question.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingRewardAdolescentAdultAmygdalaAntipsychotic AgentsApplied Behavior AnalysisBrain MappingCase-Control StudiesFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMaleMotivationPhotic StimulationSchizophreniaAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID30242202
PMCPMC6154975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.