Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242090›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry2019

Assessing the long-term effectiveness of interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate in multiple sclerosis: final 10-year results from the UK multiple sclerosis risk-sharing scheme.

Jacqueline Palace, Martin Duddy, Michael Lawton, Thomas Bregenzer, Feng Zhu, Mike Boggild, Benjamin Piske, Neil P Robertson, Joel Oger, Helen Tremlett and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. MS Fatigue Post High-Efficacy Treatment.European journal of neurology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Altered Immune Phenotypes andFrontiers in immunology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Jacqueline PalaceClinical Neurology, The Oxford University Hospitals Trust, Oxford, UK jacqueline.palace@ndcn.ox.ac.uk.
Martin DuddyDepartment of Neurology, The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Michael LawtonPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3419-0354
Thomas BregenzerBiostatistics, PAREXEL International, Berlin, Germany.
Feng ZhuDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mike BoggildThe Townsville Hospital, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Benjamin PiskeBiostatistics, PAREXEL International, Berlin, Germany.
Neil P RobertsonInstitute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Cardiff University, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
Joel OgerDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Helen TremlettDepartment of Medicine (Neurology), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5804-2535
Kate TillingPopulation Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Yoav Ben-Shlomo *Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Richard Lilford *Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
Charles DobsonDepartment of Health, Leeds, UK.
University of Bristol · GBUniversity of British Columbia · CANewcastle upon Tyne Hospital · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBTownsville Hospital · AUUniversity Hospital of Wales · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Department of Health 10/55/01Medical Research Council MR/L010305/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBecause multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease causing disability over decades, it is crucial to know if the short-term effects of disease-modifying therapies reported in randomised controlled trials reduce long-term disability. This 10-year prospective observational study of disability outcomes (Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and utility) was set up, in conjunction with a risk-sharing agreement between payers and producers, to investigate this issue.

methodsThe outcomes of the UK treated patients were compared with a modelled untreated control based on the British Columbia MS data set to assess the long-term effectiveness of these treatments. Two complementary analysis models were used: a multilevel model (MLM) and a continuous Markov model.

results4862 patients with MS were eligible for the primary analysis (mean and median follow-up times 8.7 and 10 years). EDSS worsening was reduced by 28% (MLM), 7% (Markov) and 24% time-adjusted Markov in the total cohort, and by 31% (MLM) and 14% (Markov) for relapsing remitting patients. The utility worsening was reduced by 23%-24% in the total cohort and by 24%-31% in the RR patients depending on the model used. All sensitivity analyses showed a treatment effect. There was a 4-year (CI 2.7 to 5.3) delay to EDSS 6.0. An apparent waning of treatment effect with time was seen. Subgroup analyses suggested better treatment effects in those treated earlier and with lower EDSS scores.

conclusionsThis study supports a beneficial effect on long-term disability with first-line MS disease-modifying treatments, which is clinically meaningful. However the waning effect noted requires further study.

Indexed as

AdultCohort StudiesDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGlatiramer AcetateHumansImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon-betaMaleMarkov ChainsMiddle AgedMultiple SclerosisTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomGlatiramer AcetateImmunosuppressive AgentsInterferon-beta

Identifiers

PMID30242090
PMCPMC6518464
OpenAlexW2890210692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.