Observational studyThe British journal of ophthalmology2019
Changes in intraocular pressure after intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide (ILUVIEN): real-world experience in three European countries.
Observational study in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01998412 (An Open Label, Registry Study of the Safety of Iluvien® 190 Micrograms Intravitreal Implant in Applicator), which is not on this map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Open Label, Registry Study of the Safety of Iluvien® 190 Micrograms Intravitreal Implant in Applicator
Who cites it
45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fluocinolone acetonide vitreous insert for chronic diabetic macular oedema: a systematic review with meta-analysis of real-world experience.Scientific reports · 2021Pooled it
- Intravitreal steroids for macular edema in diabetes.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Improvement in visual outcomes in diabetic macular edema through the reduction of macular thickness fluctuations using the 0, 19 mg fluocinolone acetonide implant.International ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Use of intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant in inflammatory macular oedema.Eye (London, England) · 2026Observational
- Fluocinolone acetonide implant in diabetic macular edema: sustained benefits and effects of following prior therapy.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2026Article
- Impact of baseline visual acuity, time-in-range and early treatment on functional outcomes in DMO: insights from the IRISS outcomes.Eye (London, England) · 2026Article
- Radiation-induced maculopathy and fluocinolone acetonide implant.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Observational
- Efficacy and safety of multiple fluocinolone acetonide implants in diabetic macular oedema: comparison between first and second intravitreal injections.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- What have we learned from a decade treating patients with diabetic macular oedema with 0.19 mg fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant?Eye (London, England) · 2025Review
- Suboptimal outcomes and treatment burden of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor treatment for diabetic macular oedema in phakic patients.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Real-World Evidence of the Long-Term Effectiveness of 0.2 μg/Day Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant in Persistent and Recurrent Diabetic Macular Edema - A Single Center Study.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Effectiveness and safety of fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant in diabetic macular edema patients considered insufficiently responsive to available therapies (REACT): a prospective, non-randomized, and multicenter study.International ophthalmology · 2023Observational
- Incidence and treatment approach of intraocular pressure elevation after various types of local steroids for retinal diseases.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023Article
- Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant Injected 1 Month after Dexamethasone Implant for Diabetic Macular Oedema: the ILUVI1MOIS Study.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- Safety and effectiveness of the fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal implant (ILUVIEN): 3-year results from the European IRISS registry study.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Clinical efficacy and safety of intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide implant for the treatment of chronic diabetic macular oedema: five-year real-world results.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Visual function and retinal morphological changes after single suprachoroidal delivery of fluocinolone acetonide (Iluvien®) implant in eyes with chronic diabetic macular edema.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2023Article
- Factors associated with the response to fluocinolone acetonide 0.19 mg in diabetic macular oedema evaluated as the area-under-the-curve.Eye (London, England) · 2023Article
- Diabetic Macular Oedema Guidelines: An Australian Perspective.Journal of ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Intravitreal Fluocinolone Acetonide Implant (ILUVIENDrug design, development and therapy · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aimsThe ILUVIEN Registry Safety Study is an ongoing, multicentre, open-label, observational study collecting real-world data on the safety and effectiveness of the 0.2 µg/day fluocinolone acetonide (FAc) implant in patients treated according to the European label requirements.
methodsPatients included in this analysis were treated for the licensed indication of chronic diabetic macular oedema (cDMO; that is, DMO that persists or recurs despite treatment). Data presented in the current analysis were collected from patient records up to 6 March 2017. Visual acuity (VA) data, including mean change in VA over time and at last observation, intraocular pressure (IOP) over the course of the study, IOP events, use of IOP-lowering therapy and cup:disc ratio were analysed. Information on additional DMO treatments post-FAc implant was also captured.
resultsFive hundred and sixty-three patients (593 eyes) were enrolled on the study. Mean IOP for the overall population remained within the normal range throughout follow-up and 76.7% of patients did not require IOP-lowering therapy following treatment with the FAc implant. Sixty-nine per cent of eyes did not require additional DMO treatments. Mean VA in the overall population increased from 51.9 letters at baseline to 55.6 letters at month 12, with a significant increase of 2.9 letters at last observation. Patients with short-term cDMO experienced greater VA gains than those with long-term cDMO.
conclusionsThe results of this analysis are comparable with those of other studies, including the Fluocinolone Acetate for Macular Edema study. The study reinforces the good safety and effectiveness profile of FAc, and demonstrates the benefit of early FAc treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.