Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30242050›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2018

Emergence of Binocular Disparity Selectivity through Hebbian Learning.

Tushar Chauhan, Timothée Masquelier, Alexandre Montlibert, Benoit R Cottereau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Multilevel development of cognitive abilities in an artificial neural network.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  3. Connectivity concepts in neuronal network modeling.PLoS computational biology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Event-Based Trajectory Prediction Using Spiking Neural Networks.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tushar ChauhanCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, 31052 Toulouse, France, and Tushar.Chauhan@cnrs.fr Benoit.Cottereau@cnrs.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-0396-4820
Timothée MasquelierCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, 31052 Toulouse, France, and.
Alexandre MontlibertCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, 31052 Toulouse, France, and.
Benoit R CottereauCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, 31052 Toulouse, France, and Tushar.Chauhan@cnrs.fr Benoit.Cottereau@cnrs.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2624-7680

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural selectivity in the early visual cortex strongly reflects the statistics of our environment (Barlow, 2001; Geisler, 2008). Although this has been described extensively in literature through various encoding hypotheses (Barlow and Földiák, 1989; Atick and Redlich, 1992; Olshausen and Field, 1996), an explanation as to how the cortex might develop the computational architecture to support these encoding schemes remains elusive. Here, using the more realistic example of binocular vision as opposed to monocular luminance-field images, we show how a simple Hebbian coincidence-detector is capable of accounting for the emergence of binocular, disparity selective, receptive fields. We propose a model based on spike timing-dependent plasticity, which not only converges to realistic single-cell and population characteristics, but also demonstrates how known biases in natural statistics may influence population encoding and downstream correlates of behavior. Furthermore, we show that the receptive fields we obtain are closer in structure to electrophysiological data reported in macaques than those predicted by normative encoding schemes (Ringach, 2002). We also demonstrate the robustness of our model to the input dataset, noise at various processing stages, and internal parameter variation. Together, our modeling results suggest that Hebbian coincidence detection is an important computational principle and could provide a biologically plausible mechanism for the emergence of selectivity to natural statistics in the early sensory cortex.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerDatabases, FactualHumansNeuronal PlasticityVision, BinocularVision DisparityVisual Cortexbinocular visiondisparity selectivityemergenceHebbian learningnatural statisticsSTDP

Identifiers

PMID30242050
PMCPMC6705998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.