Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30241729›Full record

ReviewUltrasound in medicine & biology2018

Engineering Theranostic Microbubbles Using Microfluidics for Ultrasound Imaging and Therapy: A Review.

Katherine W Pulsipher, Daniel A Hammer, Daeyeon Lee, Chandra M Sehgal

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Theranostic biomaterials for tissue engineering.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2021
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Fabrication and Applications of Microfluidic Devices: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katherine W PulsipherDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Daniel A HammerDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Daeyeon LeeDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Chandra M SehgalDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: Chandra.Sehgal@uphs.upenn.edu.

Funding

Tunable microbubbles for antivascular ultrasoundR01EB022612 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SEHGAL, CHANDRA M · 2016 to 2019
$1.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbubbles interact with ultrasound in various ways to enable their applications in ultrasound imaging and diagnosis. To generate high contrast and maximize therapeutic efficacy, microbubbles of high uniformity are required. Microfluidic technology, which enables precise control of small volumes of fluid at the sub-millimeter scale, has provided a versatile platform on which to produce highly uniform microbubbles for potential applications in ultrasound imaging and diagnosis. Here, we describe fundamental microfluidic principles and the most common types of microfluidic devices used to produce sub-10 μm microbubbles, appropriate for biomedical ultrasound. Bubbles can be engineered for specific applications by tailoring the bubble size, inner gas and shell composition and by functionalizing for additional imaging modalities, therapeutics or targeting ligands. To translate the laboratory-scale discoveries to widespread clinical use of these microfluidic-based microbubbles, increased bubble production is needed. We present various strategies recently developed to improve scale-up. We conclude this review by describing some outstanding problems in the field and presenting areas for future use of microfluidics in ultrasound.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaMicrobubblesHumansImage EnhancementMicrofluidicsTheranostic NanomedicineUltrasonographyContrast MediaContrast agentMicrobubbleMicrofluidics

Identifiers

PMID30241729
PMCPMC6643280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.