Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30241561›Full record

ArticleTrials2018

A double blind randomised control trial investigating the efficacy of platelet rich plasma versus placebo for the treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome (the HIPPO trial): a protocol for a randomised clinical trial.

Eshan Oderuth, Mohammed Ali, Ismael Atchia, Ajay Malviya

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03479190 (A Double Blind Randomised Control Trial Investigating the Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03479190 nacompletednot on this map

A Double Blind Randomised Control Trial Investigating the Efficacy of Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (HiPPO Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation TrustRan2018 to 2022Enrolled84ConditionsGreater Trochanteric Pain SyndromeArmsultrasound guided injection of Platelet rich plasma, ultrasound guided injection of Normal Saline
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Eshan OderuthChesterfield Royal Hospital, Chesterfield, UK.
Mohammed AliNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK. Mohammedkhider84@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0012-0451
Ismael AtchiaNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.
Ajay MalviyaNorthumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, North Shields, UK.
Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust · GBChesterfield Royal Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGreater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a painful condition characterised by pain around the greater trochanter usually affecting middle-aged women. The majority of patients will improve with conservative management such as physiotherapy and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); however, if this fails then more invasive treatments including corticosteroid injections and surgery may be required. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous blood product, which has a higher concentration of growth factors postulated to provide enhanced healing and anti-inflammatory properties. There have been numerous studies on PRP's efficacy in musculoskeletal soft tissue conditions with similar pathology to GTPS, with varying results, most promising being in plantar fasciopathy and patellar tendinopathy. Corticosteroids are the established second-line treatment, but do not always work long term. PRP may be a suitable alternative to corticosteroid in GTPS with longer-term effects; however, there are very limited reports. The Hip Injections PRP Vs Placebo (HIPPO) trial aims to assess the ability of PRP to improve symptoms and function in patients with GTPS. METHODS/

designHIPPO is a single-centre, double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study in patients with a radiologically confirmed diagnosis of gluteus medius or minimus tendinopathy with swelling within the tendon insertion with or without bursitis. We aim to randomise 102 patients with GTPS to either the PRP or placebo (normal saline injection) treatment arm. Participants will receive one ultrasound (US) guided PRP/placebo injection into the trochanteric bursa and surrounding gluteus medius/minimus tendons. The primary outcome measure is the International Hip Outcome Tool-12. Secondary outcome measures will include a visual analogue score for pain, the three-level version of the EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire and the modified Harris Hip Score. Outcomes will be measured at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Participants will have the option at 6 months to have a repeat blinded injection or cross over to PRP. Analyses of primary and secondary outcomes will be made according to the intention-to-treat principle. The trial reporting will comply with Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) guidelines. DISCUSSION: The HIPPO study has been designed to test the hypothesis that PRP is effective in treating GTPS in patients who have failed conservative management and to assess the duration of effect of PRP.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03479190 . Registered on 27 March 2018.

Indexed as

Platelet-Rich PlasmaBursitisDisability EvaluationDouble-Blind MethodEnglandHumansMusculoskeletal PainPain MeasurementRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionSyndromeTendinopathyTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeGluteus medius tendinopathyGreater trochanteric pain syndromePlatelet-rich plasmaTrochanteric bursitis

Identifiers

PMID30241561
PMCPMC6151005
OpenAlexW2891211264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.