ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2018
Assessing utility values for treatment-related health states of acute myeloid leukemia in the United States.
Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Evolving Landscape of Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: A Systematic Review.PharmacoEconomics · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Trial
- Cost Effectiveness of Midostaurin in the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed FLT3-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the United States.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Trial
- Blinatumomab for treatment of children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in Hong Kong: A cost-effectiveness analysis.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Epcoritamab Plus Lenalidomide and Rituximab Versus Lenalidomide and Rituximab for Relapsed/Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: A US Payer Perspective.Hematological oncology · 2026Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Pre-emptive DPYD Genotyping Compared to Standard of Care Among Patients Receiving Fluoropyrimidine-Based Anti-cancer Treatment in Australia.Clinical drug investigation · 2025Article
- Public Preference for Off-Label Use of Drugs for Cancer Treatment and Relative Importance of Associated Adverse Events: A Discrete Choice Experiment and Best-Worst Scaling.Applied health economics and health policy · 2024Article
- Home time among older adults with acute myeloid leukemia by therapy intensity.Haematologica · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness of targeted treatment vs chemoimmunotherapy in treatment-naive unfit CLL without TP53 aberrations.Blood advances · 2023Article
- Oral Azacitidine for Maintenance Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukaemia After Induction Therapy: An Evidence Review Group Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.PharmacoEconomics · 2023Review
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Intravascular Targeted Temperature Management after Cardiac Arrest in England.PharmacoEconomics - open · 2022Article
- Effects of Metreleptin on Patient Outcomes and Quality of Life in Generalized and Partial Lipodystrophy.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2021Article
- A systematic literature review of disease burden and clinical efficacy for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia.American journal of blood research · 2021Review
- Exploring the burden of short-term CHOP chemotherapy adverse events in post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease: a comprehensive literature review in lymphoma patients.Journal of drug assessment · 2020Article
- American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for treating newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in older adults.Blood advances · 2020Article
- Evaluation of quality of life and its influencing factors after transplantation of leukemia patients based on SF-36 score: a cohort study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Biomarker-Guided Treatment for Metastatic Gastric Cancer in the Second-Line Setting.Journal of oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreference valuations of health status are essential in health technology and economic appraisal. This study estimated utilities for treatment-related health states of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and disutilities of severe adverse events (SAEs) using a representative sample of adults from the general population in the United States (US).
methodsTreatment-related AML health states, defined based on literature and interviews with clinicians, included complete remission (CR), no CR, relapse, stem cell transplant (SCT), and post SCT short-term recovery. Six attributes with varying levels, including fever, lack of energy, problems with daily function, anxiety/depression, blood transfusions, and hospitalization, were used to define health states. An online survey using discrete choice experiment methodology was designed to capture preferences for health status scenarios including the identified attributes and key grade 3/4 chemotherapy-related SAEs. Health state utilities and SAE disutilities were generated from a conditional logistic regression with generalized estimating equations.
resultsOf the 300 survey participants, the demographic distributions were within a 3% margin of those in the 2010 US Census. CR had the highest utility value (0.875), followed by post-SCT short-term recovery (0.398), relapse (0.355), no CR (0.262), and SCT (0.158). Of the SAEs, serious infection had the highest decline in utility (0.218), followed by severe diarrhea (0.176), abnormally low blood cell counts (0.100), and severe redness/skin peeling (0.060).
conclusionsAML and treatments can result in reduced quality of life and impaired ability to perform daily activities. Findings of this study underline the value that society places on treatment-related AML health states and SAEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.