Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30241538›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2018

Assessing utility values for treatment-related health states of acute myeloid leukemia in the United States.

Eytan M Stein, Min Yang, Annie Guerin, Wei Gao, Philip Galebach, Cheryl Q Xiang, Subrata Bhattacharyya, Gaetano Bonifacio, George J Joseph

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation of quality of life and its influencing factors after transplantation of leukemia patients based on SF-36 score: a cohort study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Eytan M SteinMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Min YangAnalysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA, USA. min.yang@analysisgroup.com.
Annie GuerinAnalysis Group, Inc, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Wei GaoAnalysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA, USA.
Philip GalebachAnalysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA, USA.
Cheryl Q XiangAnalysis Group, Inc, Boston, MA, USA.
Subrata BhattacharyyaNovartis Healthcare Pvt, Ltd, Hyderabad, India.
Gaetano BonifacioNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.
George J JosephNovartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPreference valuations of health status are essential in health technology and economic appraisal. This study estimated utilities for treatment-related health states of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and disutilities of severe adverse events (SAEs) using a representative sample of adults from the general population in the United States (US).

methodsTreatment-related AML health states, defined based on literature and interviews with clinicians, included complete remission (CR), no CR, relapse, stem cell transplant (SCT), and post SCT short-term recovery. Six attributes with varying levels, including fever, lack of energy, problems with daily function, anxiety/depression, blood transfusions, and hospitalization, were used to define health states. An online survey using discrete choice experiment methodology was designed to capture preferences for health status scenarios including the identified attributes and key grade 3/4 chemotherapy-related SAEs. Health state utilities and SAE disutilities were generated from a conditional logistic regression with generalized estimating equations.

resultsOf the 300 survey participants, the demographic distributions were within a 3% margin of those in the 2010 US Census. CR had the highest utility value (0.875), followed by post-SCT short-term recovery (0.398), relapse (0.355), no CR (0.262), and SCT (0.158). Of the SAEs, serious infection had the highest decline in utility (0.218), followed by severe diarrhea (0.176), abnormally low blood cell counts (0.100), and severe redness/skin peeling (0.060).

conclusionsAML and treatments can result in reduced quality of life and impaired ability to perform daily activities. Findings of this study underline the value that society places on treatment-related AML health states and SAEs.

Indexed as

Health StatusAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeUnited StatesYoung AdultAcute myeloid leukemiaDiscrete choice experimentHealth statePreference valuationUtility

Identifiers

PMID30241538
PMCPMC6151058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.