Is protein intake saturated at doses recommended by the feeding guidelines for critically ill patients?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Semi-elemental versus polymeric formula for enteral nutrition in brain-injured critically ill patients: a randomized trial.Critical care (London, England) · 2021
   Trial
2. Response to Gunst and Casaer on the letter to the editor "Is the protein intake saturated at doses recommended by the feeding guidelines for critically ill patients?"Critical care (London, England) · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Commented on by
  Response to Gunst and Casaer on the letter to the editor "Is the protein intake saturated at doses recommended by the feeding guidelines for critically ill patients?"2018
• Comment on
  Very high intact-protein formula successfully provides protein intake according to nutritional recommendations in overweight critically ill patients: a double-blind randomized trial.2018

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as