Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30241464›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2018

Initial state perturbations as a validation method for data-driven fuzzy models of cellular networks.

Lidija Magdevska, Miha Mraz, Nikolaj Zimic, Miha Moškon

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lidija MagdevskaFaculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia. lm4828@student.uni-lj.si.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9835-3204
Miha MrazFaculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.
Nikolaj ZimicFaculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.
Miha MoškonFaculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Večna pot 113, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData-driven methods that automatically learn relations between attributes from given data are a popular tool for building mathematical models in computational biology. Since measurements are prone to errors, approaches dealing with uncertain data are especially suitable for this task. Fuzzy models are one such approach, but they contain a large amount of parameters and are thus susceptible to over-fitting. Validation methods that help detect over-fitting are therefore needed to eliminate inaccurate models.

resultsWe propose a method to enlarge the validation datasets on which a fuzzy dynamic model of a cellular network can be tested. We apply our method to two data-driven dynamic models of the MAPK signalling pathway and two models of the mammalian circadian clock. We show that random initial state perturbations can drastically increase the mean error of predictions of an inaccurate computational model, while keeping errors of predictions of accurate models small.

conclusionsWith the improvement of validation methods, fuzzy models are becoming more accurate and are thus likely to gain new applications. This field of research is promising not only because fuzzy models can cope with uncertainty, but also because their run time is short compared to conventional modelling methods that are nowadays used in systems biology.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationFuzzy LogicGene Regulatory NetworksComputational BiologyHumansSystems BiologyCircadian clockData-driven modellingDynamic modellingFuzzy logicMAPK signalling pathwayModel validation

Identifiers

PMID30241464
PMCPMC6150993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.