Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30241294›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Occupational Health Risk Assessment in the Electronics Industry in China Based on the Occupational Classification Method and EPA Model.

Ying Cai, Fei Li, Jingdong Zhang, Zixian Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Application of a Caries Treatment Difficulty Assessment System in Dental Caries Management.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ying CaiResearch Center for Environment and Health, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China. 1993cy@zuel.edu.cn.
Fei LiResearch Center for Environment and Health, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China. lifei@zuel.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4791-3264
Jingdong ZhangResearch Center for Environment and Health, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China. jdzhang@zuel.edu.cn.
Zixian WuResearch Center for Environment and Health, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China. wuzixianjia@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The awareness of occupational health risk management in the electronics industry is weak in China, and many Chinese occupational health management regulations have not been effectively implemented. China's current occupational hazards classification method and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) inhalation risk assessment model recognized internationally were used to perform health risk assessments for a chip manufacturing company in the electronics industry in order to determine the existing problems and put forward the optimization proposals of the occupational hazards classification method in China. The results showed that the detected concentrations of toxic and harmful chemicals in all testing points did not exceed the occupational health exposure limits in China. According to the EPA inhalation risk assessment model, the highest values of non-carcinogenic risks of ammonia, chlorine, fluoride, sulfuric acid, hydrogen chloride, ethylene glycol, phosphine, boron trifluoride, isopropanol, benzene, and xylene were 5.10, 67.12, 1.71, 45.98, 1.83, 1.43, 160.35, 46.56, 2.52, 5.55, and 5.37, respectively, which means workers in electronic chip manufacturing companies exposed to these chemicals have higher occupational health risks. However, on the basis of the occupational hazards classification method, the occupational health risks of exposure to the toxic and hazardous chemicals are relatively harmless operations. The evaluation results of the EPA inhalation risk assessment model are generally higher than those of the occupational hazards classification method. It's recommended to refine the value of occupational exposure limit B, taking more characteristics of the hazard factors into account and fuzzifying the parameters to optimize the occupational hazards classification method. At the same time, it is suggested that the electronic chip manufacturing company should conduct anti-virus risk management covering in three aspects: increasing the awareness of occupational hazards, enhancing system ventilation, and improving personal health management measures.

Indexed as

ElectronicsChinaEnvironmental MonitoringGuidelines as TopicHazardous SubstancesHumansIndustryOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthRisk AssessmentUnited StatesUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyHazardous Substanceselectronics industryEPA inhalation risk assessment modeloccupational hazards classificationoccupational healthrisk management

Identifiers

PMID30241294
PMCPMC6210263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.