ArticleJournal of global oncology2018
Impact of GI Tumor Board on Patient Management and Adherence to Guidelines.
Article in Journal of global oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Tumour boards and their quality of structures, processes, and team performance in multidisciplinary cancer care: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- ASO Author Reflections: The Need for Improved Documentation at Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Documentation: Assessing its Frequency, Quality, and Impact.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Adherence to Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Recommendations and Its Association with Survival: A Retrospective Observational Study of Colorectal Cancer Patients.Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025Observational
- Adherence to Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Recommendations in Patients with Multiple Myeloma.Cancers · 2025Article
- The role of the multidisciplinary tumor board after endoscopic resection of malignant tumors: is it worth it?Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
- Quality Measures for Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards and Their Role in Improving Cancer Care.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2024Review
- Ethical Considerations of Biopsies in Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer.JCO oncology practice · 2023Article
- ESMO/ASCO Recommendations for a Global Curriculum in Medical Oncology Edition 2023.JCO global oncology · 2023Article
- Using Brain Tumor MRI Structured Reporting to Quantify the Impact of Imaging on Brain Tumor Boards.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2023Article
- Improving coordination of lung cancer care at a tertiary healthcare center in Saudi Arabia.Saudi medical journal · 2022Article
- Clinical outcomes of patients with pancreatic tumors discussed in Tumor Board.Revista do Colegio Brasileiro de Cirurgioes · 2022Article
- Survival Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Tumor Board for Breast Cancer in Mozambique, Sub-Saharan Africa.The oncologist · 2021Article
- Translation of oncology multidisciplinary team meeting (MDM) recommendations into clinical practice.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Do Multidisciplinary Tumor Board Discussions Correlate With Increase in 5-Year Survival? A Meta-Analysis Study.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2021Article
- Benefits and Limitations of a Multidisciplinary Approach in Cancer Patient Management.Cancer management and research · 2020Review
- Image analysis in posttreatment non-small cell lung cancer surveillance: specialists' interpretations reviewed by the thoracic multidisciplinary tumor board.Multidisciplinary respiratory medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAs the burden of cancer on the population and the health care system continues to increase with more complicated treatment options, the need for multidisciplinary teams to be as efficient as possible becomes more vital. Our study aimed to evaluate the consistency of GI Tumor Board (GI TB) recommendations with international guidelines, the adherence of physicians involved in patient care to TB recommendations, and the impact on the management of patients.
methodsA prospective cohort study was conducted from January to June 2016 at our institution, which is a major tertiary hospital that provides comprehensive cancer care. All cases presented at the GI TB during this period were included. Data regarding adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines, adherence to TB recommendations, and changes made to the management of patients were collected weekly from the GI TB in a data collection form.
resultsOf the 104 patients included, 57 (55%) were males and the median age was 58 (16 to 85) years. Colorectal cancer was the most common diagnosis, in 65 patients (63%). Nearly one-half of cases (45%) were stage IV cancers. Starting new treatment was recommended for 72 patients (69%). Further investigations were requested for 15 patients (14%). For imaging, 24 recommendations (23%) were made. Adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines was observed in 97% of total recommendations. New findings were found in pathology (11%), radiology (13%), and staging (4%). Management plans were changed in 37 cases (36%). Over a 3-month period after presentation to the GI TB, most of the recommendations (87%) were performed.
conclusionA multidisciplinary tumor board enhances the adherence to guidelines and has an impact on patient management in approximately one-third of patients. Among physicians, adherence to recommendations of the TB was high.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.