ArticleJournal of global oncology2018
Comparison of the Accuracy of Papanicolaou Test Cytology, Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid, and Visual Inspection With Lugol Iodine in Screening for Cervical Neoplasia in Southeast Nigeria.
Article in Journal of global oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrated HPV Testing, TCT, and Colposcopic VIA/VILI Improves Detection Rate for HSIL and Cervical Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort in China.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- Cervical Cancer Screening Recommendations: Now and for the Future.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Article
- Role of Artificial Intelligence Interpretation of Colposcopic Images in Cervical Cancer Screening.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Ensemble Deep Learning for Cervix Image Selection toward Improving Reliability in Automated Cervical Precancer Screening.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Association between obesity and abnormal Papanicolau(Pap) smear cytology results in a resource-poor Nigerian setting.BMC women's health · 2020Article
- Cervical Cancer Screening Utilization and Its Correlates Among Women of Reproductive Age in North Central Nigeria: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nigerian medical journal : journal of the Nigeria Medical AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis study aimed to compare the accuracy of Papanicolaou test cytology, visual inspection with 5% acetic acid (VIA), and visual inspection with Lugol iodine (VILI) in the detection of premalignant and malignant lesions of the cervix. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a cross-sectional comparative study of 200 consenting participants at the Federal Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki over a 6-month period. All the participants had Papanicolaou test cytology. Subsequently, they were classified into two groups of 100 each through systematic random sampling: group 1 had VIA and group 2 had VILI. Thereafter, all the participants had cervical punch biopsy at the 6 and 12 o'clock cervical positions. Cervical punch biopsy was also done on the suspicious lesions of the cervix irrespective of their positions. The tests of validity of the three methods were calculated using the histology of the biopsy specimen as the gold standard. P value ≤ .05 was considered to be statistically significant.
resultsAmong the VIA group, 19 (19%) had cervical epithelial abnormalities on Papanicolaou test cytology, and VIA was positive in 14 (14%). Histology results showed cervical neoplasia in 15 (15%) of the participants. Among the VILI group, 15 (15%) had cervical epithelial abnormalities on Papanicolaou test cytology, and VILI was positive in 19 (19%). Histology results showed cervical neoplasia in 15 (15%) of the participants. There was no significant difference in overall accuracy of Papanicolaou test cytology, VIA, and VILI. The overall accuracy of the Papanicolaou test cytology plus VIA was significantly more than Papanicolaou test cytology alone.
conclusionVIA or VILI can be used as a stand-alone cervical cancer screening test when compared with Papanicolaou test cytology, particularly in resource-limited settings. VIA can also complement Papanicolaou test cytology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.