Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30241114›Full record

ArticleClinical obesity2018

Personalizing obesity assessment and care planning in primary care: patient experience and outcomes in everyday life and health.

T Luig, R Anderson, A M Sharma, D L Campbell-Scherer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical obesity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Social justice for adults with high body weight: a systematic review.International journal for equity in health · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Obesity in adults: a clinical practice guideline.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020 · on this map
    Guideline
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. 'Beyond the Scale': A Qualitative Exploration of the Impact of Weight Stigma Experienced by Patients With Obesity in General Practice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

T LuigDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8877-5369
R AndersonEdmonton Southside Primary Care Network, Edmonton, Canada.
A M SharmaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
D L Campbell-SchererDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.

Funding

Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions 201200852Mitacs IT09210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obesity is a complex, chronic disease, frequently associated with multiple comorbidities. Its management is hampered by a lack of translation of evidence on chronicity and pathophysiology into clinical practice. Also, it is not well understood how to support effective provider-patient communication that adequately addresses patients' personal root causes and barriers and helps them feel capable to take action for their health. This study examined interpersonal processes during clinical consultations, their impacts, and outcomes with the aim to develop an approach to personalized obesity assessment and care planning. We used a qualitative, explorative design with 20 participants with obesity, sampling for maximum variation, to examine video-recorded consultations, patient interviews at three time points, provider interviews and patient journals. Analysis was grounded in a dialogic interactional perspective and found eight key processes that supported patients in making changes to improve health: compassion and listening; making sense of root causes and contextual factors in the patient's story; recognizing strengths; reframing misconceptions about obesity; focusing on whole-person health; action planning; fostering reflection and experimenting. Patient outcomes include activation, improved physical and psychological health. The proposed approach fosters emphatic care relationships and sensible care plans that support patients in making manageable changes to improve health.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAdultAgedBehavior TherapyCommunicationEmpathyFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationObesityPatient-Centered CarePhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health Careobesity managementpatient-centred careprimary health carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID30241114
PMCPMC6282952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.