Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30240744›Full record

ArticleiScience2018

Microbial Quantity Impacts Drosophila Nutrition, Development, and Lifespan.

Erin S Keebaugh, Ryuichi Yamada, Benjamin Obadia, William B Ludington, William W Ja

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 118 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meta-analysis of Diets Used inG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. The Gut Microbiota ofMicroorganisms · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Minor impact of probiotic bacteria and egg white onFrontiers in insect science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin S KeebaughDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA; Center on Aging, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
Ryuichi YamadaDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA; Center on Aging, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA.
Benjamin ObadiaDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
William B LudingtonDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
William W JaDepartment of Neuroscience, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA; Center on Aging, The Scripps Research Institute, Jupiter, FL 33458, USA. Electronic address: wja@scripps.edu.
Scripps Research Institute · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Nutritional and Epigenetic Priming of Metabolism and Aging in DrosophilaR01AG045036 · NIA · SCRIPPS FLORIDA · PI JA, WILLIAM W · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Developing a reduced complexity model gut microbiome in the behavior model, Drosophila melanogasterDP5OD017851 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LUDINGTON, WILLIAM BASIL · 2013 to 2017
$2.0M
Role of bacteria in development and lifespan of Drosophila melanogasterR00AG030493 · NIA · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI JA, WILLIAM W · 2010 to 2012
$728k
NIA NIH HHS R00 AG030493NIA NIH HHS R01 AG045036NIH HHS DP5 OD017851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Drosophila, microbial association can promote development or extend life. We tested the impact of microbial association during malnutrition and show that microbial quantity is a predictor of fly longevity. Although all tested microbes, when abundantly provided, can rescue lifespan on low-protein diet, the effect of a single inoculation seems linked to the ability of that microbial strain to thrive under experimental conditions. Microbes, dead or alive, phenocopy dietary protein, and the calculated dependence on microbial protein content is similar to the protein requirements determined from fly feeding studies, suggesting that microbes enhance host protein nutrition by serving as protein-rich food. Microbes that enhance larval growth are also associated with the ability to better thrive on fly culture medium. Our results suggest an unanticipated range of microbial species that promote fly development and longevity and highlight microbial quantity as an important determinant of effects on physiology and lifespan during undernutrition.

Indexed as

MicrobiologyMicrobiomeNutrition in Life Cycle

Identifiers

PMID30240744
PMCPMC6146667
OpenAlexW2805688834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.