Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30240547›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2018

Human posterior parietal cortex responds to visual stimuli as early as peristriate occipital cortex.

Tamar I Regev, Jonathan Winawer, Edden M Gerber, Robert T Knight, Leon Y Deouell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cellular and laminar architecture: A short history and commentary.The Journal of comparative neurology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. An expanded neural framework for shape perception.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The Dorsal Visual Pathway Represents Object-Centered Spatial Relations for Object Recognition.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Noninvasive neuromagnetic single-trial analysis of human neocortical population spikes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tamar I RegevEdmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-0639-0890
Jonathan WinawerDepartment of Psychology and Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-7475-5586
Edden M GerberEdmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
Robert T KnightHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute and Department of Psychology, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Leon Y DeouellEdmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-6147-5208
Hebrew University of Jerusalem · ILBerkeley College · USNew York University · US

Funding

Development and validation of empirical models of the neuronal population activity underlying non-invasive human brain measurementsR01MH111417 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT · PI DEVINSKY, ORRIN, DIJKHUIZEN, RICK M · 2016 to 2020
$4.4M
ATTENTION, ORIENTATION, & THE HUMAN PREFRONTAL CORTEXR37NS021135 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI KNIGHT, ROBERT THOMAS · 2013 to 2019
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH111417NINDS NIH HHS R37 NS021135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much of what is known about the timing of visual processing in the brain is inferred from intracranial studies in monkeys, with human data limited to mainly noninvasive methods with lower spatial resolution. Here, we estimated visual onset latencies from electrocorticographic (ECoG) recordings in a patient who was implanted with 112 subdural electrodes, distributed across the posterior cortex of the right hemisphere, for presurgical evaluation of intractable epilepsy. Functional MRI prior to surgery was used to determine boundaries of visual areas. The patient was presented with images of objects from several categories. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were calculated across all categories excluding targets, and statistically reliable onset latencies were determined, using a bootstrapping procedure over the single trial baseline activity in individual electrodes. The distribution of onset latencies broadly reflected the known hierarchy of visual areas, with the earliest cortical responses in primary visual cortex, and higher areas showing later responses. A clear exception to this pattern was a robust, statistically reliable and spatially localized, very early response, on the bank of the posterior intraparietal sulcus (IPS). The response in the IPS started nearly simultaneously with responses detected in peristriate visual areas, around 60 ms poststimulus onset. Our results support the notion of early visual processing in the posterior parietal lobe, not respecting traditional hierarchies, and give direct evidence for onset times of visual responses across the human cortex.

Indexed as

AdultBrainElectrodes, ImplantedElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsEvoked Potentials, VisualHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleOccipital LobeParietal LobePhotic StimulationVisual Cortexearly visual processingECoGelectrocorticographyonset latency estimation

Identifiers

PMID30240547
PMCPMC6482330
OpenAlexW2951954941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.