ArticlePLoS computational biology2018
Condition-adaptive fused graphical lasso (CFGL): An adaptive procedure for inferring condition-specific gene co-expression network.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating multi-omics to unveil PSMD12 as a critical gene in promoting brain metastases of lung adenocarcinoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Algal origins of core land plant stress response subnetworks.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- AJGM: joint learning of heterogeneous gene networks with adaptive graphical model.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Reassessing the modularity of gene co-expression networks using the Stochastic Block Model.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Reassessing the modularity of gene co-expression networks using the Stochastic Block Model.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Gene communities in co-expression networks across different tissues.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- Joint gene network construction by single-cell RNA sequencing data.Biometrics · 2023Article
- RCFGL: Rapid Condition adaptive Fused Graphical Lasso and application to modeling brain region co-expression networks.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- scLink: Inferring Sparse Gene Co-expression Networks from Single-cell Expression Data.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2021Article
- Efficient Inference of Spatially-Varying Gaussian Markov Random Fields With Applications in Gene Regulatory Networks.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Co-expression network analysis provides useful information for studying gene regulation in biological processes. Examining condition-specific patterns of co-expression can provide insights into the underlying cellular processes activated in a particular condition. One challenge in this type of analysis is that the sample sizes in each condition are usually small, making the statistical inference of co-expression patterns highly underpowered. A joint network construction that borrows information from related structures across conditions has the potential to improve the power of the analysis. One possible approach to constructing the co-expression network is to use the Gaussian graphical model. Though several methods are available for joint estimation of multiple graphical models, they do not fully account for the heterogeneity between samples and between co-expression patterns introduced by condition specificity. Here we develop the condition-adaptive fused graphical lasso (CFGL), a data-driven approach to incorporate condition specificity in the estimation of co-expression networks. We show that this method improves the accuracy with which networks are learned. The application of this method on a rat multi-tissue dataset and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer dataset provides interesting biological insights. In both analyses, we identify numerous modules enriched for Gene Ontology functions and observe that the modules that are upregulated in a particular condition are often involved in condition-specific activities. Interestingly, we observe that the genes strongly associated with survival time in the TCGA dataset are less likely to be network hubs, suggesting that genes associated with cancer progression are likely to govern specific functions or execute final biological functions in pathways, rather than regulating a large number of biological processes. Additionally, we observed that the tumor-specific hub genes tend to have few shared edges with normal tissue, revealing tumor-specific regulatory mechanism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.