Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30240357›Full record

ArticleDiagnosis (Berlin, Germany)2018

"Closing the loop": a mixed-methods study about resident learning from outcome feedback after patient handoffs.

Edna C Shenvi, Stephanie Feudjio Feupe, Hai Yang, Robert El-Kareh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnosis (Berlin, Germany), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Impact of performance and information feedback on medical interns' confidence-accuracy calibration.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2024
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Edna C ShenviDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Stephanie Feudjio FeupeUCSD Health Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Hai YangUCSD Health Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Robert El-KarehMPH UCSD Health Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Funding

San Diego Biomedical Informatics Education & Research (SABER)T15LM011271 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SHAMIM NEMATI · 2012 to 2026
$9.7M
Minimizing Physician Errors: Feedback of Patient Outcomes After HandoffsK22LM011435 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI EL-KAREH, ROBERT E · 2013 to 2015
$476k
NLM NIH HHS K22 LM011435NLM NIH HHS T15 LM011271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Learning patient outcomes is recognized as crucial for ongoing refinement of clinical decision-making, but is often difficult in fragmented care with frequent handoffs. Data on resident habits of seeking outcome feedback after handoffs are lacking. Methods We performed a mixed-methods study including (1) an analysis of chart re-access rates after handoffs performed using access logs of the electronic health record (EHR); and (2) a web-based survey sent to internal medicine (IM) and emergency medicine (EM) residents about their habits of and barriers to learning the outcomes of patients after they have handed them off to other teams. Results Residents on ward rotations were often able to re-access charts of patients after handoffs, but those on EM or night admitting rotations did so <5% of the time. Among residents surveyed, only a minority stated that they frequently find out the outcomes of patients they have handed off, although learning outcomes was important to both their education and job satisfaction. Most were not satisfied with current systems of learning outcomes of patients after handoffs, citing too little time and lack of reliable patient tracking systems as the main barriers. Conclusions Despite perceived importance of learning outcomes after handoffs, residents cite difficulty with obtaining such information. Systematically providing feedback on patient outcomes would meet a recognized need among physicians in training.

Indexed as

Access to InformationClinical CompetenceFeedbackInternship and ResidencyPatient HandoffAttitude of Health PersonnelClinical Decision-MakingElectronic Health RecordsEmergency MedicineHabitsHumansInformation Seeking BehaviorInternal MedicineJob SatisfactionLearningPatient Identification Systemscompetencyeducation and training issuesreflections on diagnosis

Identifiers

PMID30240357
PMCPMC6556111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.