Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30239760›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2018

Physiology of Glycemic Recovery and Stabilization After Hyperinsulinemic Euglycemic Clamp in Healthy Subjects.

Ibiye Owei, Nidhi Jain, David Jones, Nkiru Umekwe, Sam Dagogo-Jack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Strategies for optimization of hypoglycemia rat models.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ibiye OweiDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Nidhi JainDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
David JonesDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Nkiru UmekweDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
Sam Dagogo-JackDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, Diabetes and Metabolism, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

Funding

Pathobiology of Prediabetes in A Bi-Racial CohortR01DK067269 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI DAGOGO-JACK, M.D., D.SC., SAMUEL · 2006 to 2017
$6.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK067269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (HEC) is the gold standard for measuring insulin sensitivity, but glycemic recovery and stabilization after the procedure have not been well studied. Here, we assessed the physiological determinants of postclamp recovery. Methods: We analyzed data from 207 healthy subjects [102 African American (AA) and 105 European American (EA)] who underwent HEC in the Pathobiology of Prediabetes in a Biracial Cohort study. At the end of HEC, insulin infusion was stopped, and dextrose (20%) infusion was tapered and stopped when plasma glucose stabilized ≥20 mg/dL above the preclamp value (∼100 mg/dL). Glucose recovery time (GRT) was defined as the interval from cessation of insulin infusion to discontinuation of dextrose infusion. Insulin clearance was calculated under basal and clamp conditions. Results: The mean (± SD) age and body mass index were 46.3 ± 9.96 years and 30.7 ± 8.43 kg/m2, respectively. Plasma glucose (mg/dL) was 92.2 ± 6.26 preclamp and 124.2 ± 26.9 postclamp. The median GRT (minutes) was 65 (range, 30 to 270); mean GRT was 77.1 ± 42.7 (men: 82.9 ± 45.5; women: 74.4 ± 42.3; AA, 82.0 ± 49.6; EA, 72.3 ± 34.2; P > 0.1 for sex or race). The 90th percentile for GRT was 119 minutes. In regression models, significant predictors of GRT were age (P = 0.03), weight (P = 0.009), 2-hour plasma glucose (P = 0.0002), insulin sensitivity (P = 0.03), disposition index (P = 0.017), and basal insulin clearance (P = 0.02). Conclusions: In our biracial cohort, glycemic recovery after hyperinsulinemic clamp was independent of sex or race but was significantly predicted by age, weight, and glucose tolerance and by insulin sensitivity, secretion, and clearance. We recommend that monitoring be maintained for ∼2 hours postclamp to ensure adequate glycemic stabilization.

Indexed as

Glucose Clamp TechniqueAdultAge FactorsBlood GlucoseCohort StudiesFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansInfusions, IntravenousInsulinInsulin ResistanceMaleMiddle AgedSex FactorsTime FactorsBlood GlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID30239760
PMCPMC6194810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.