ArticleDatabase : the journal of biological databases and curation2018
PubMed Labs: an experimental system for improving biomedical literature search.
Article in Database : the journal of biological databases and curation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- TraceEyeDisease: a web-based database for investigating trace elements and their imbalances in eye diseases.BMC research notes · 2024Article
- Recent advances in aptamer applications for analytical biochemistry.Analytical biochemistry · 2022Article
- Commentary to Gusenbauer and Haddaway 2020: Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar and PubMed.Research synthesis methods · 2021Article
- Better synonyms for enriching biomedical search.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2020Article
- Searching PubMed to Retrieve Publications on the COVID-19 Pandemic: Comparative Analysis of Search Strings.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- AI in Health: State of the Art, Challenges, and Future Directions.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2019Review
- The 26th annual Nucleic Acids Research database issue and Molecular Biology Database Collection.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information.Nucleic acids research · 2019Article
- How user intelligence is improving PubMed.Nature biotechnology · 2018Article
- Trends in… Modernization at the Nation's Medical Library.Medical reference services quarterlyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed is a freely accessible system for searching the biomedical literature, with ~ 2.5 million users worldwide on an average workday. In order to better meet our users' needs in an era of information overload, we have recently developed PubMed Labs (www.pubmed.gov/labs), an experimental system for users to test new search features/tools (e.g. Best Match) and provide feedback, which enables us to make more informed decisions about potential changes to improve the search quality and overall usability of PubMed. In addition, PubMed Labs features a mobile-first and responsive layout that offers better support for accessing PubMed from increasingly popular mobiles and small-screen devices. In this paper, we detail PubMed Labs, its purpose, new features and best practices. We also encourage users to share their experience with us; based on which we are continuously improving PubMed Labs with more advanced features and better user experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.