Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30239642›Full record

ReviewEndocrinology2018

Models and Tools for Studying Enteroendocrine Cells.

Deborah A Goldspink, Frank Reimann, Fiona M Gribble

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Endocrinology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cellular mechanisms of incretin hormone secretion.Journal of molecular endocrinology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dorothy Hodgkin lecture 2023: The enteroendocrine system-Sensors in your guts.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Enteroendocrine System and Gut Barrier in Metabolic Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deborah A GoldspinkMetabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Frank ReimannMetabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Fiona M GribbleMetabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00014/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_00014/5Medical Research Council MC_UU_12012/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_12012/5Medical Research Council MRC_MC_UU_12012/5Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 106262/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 106263/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut hormones produced by gastrointestinal enteroendocrine cells modulate key physiological processes including glucose homeostasis and food intake, making them potential therapeutic candidates to treat obesity and diabetes. Understanding the function of enteroendocrine cells and the molecular mechanisms driving hormone production is a key step toward mobilizing endogenous hormone reserves in the gut as a therapeutic strategy. In this review, we will discuss the variety of ex vivo and in vitro model systems driving this research and their contributions to our current understanding of nutrient-sensing mechanisms in enteroendocrine cells.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAnimalsEatingEndocrinologyEnteroendocrine CellsGastrointestinal HormonesGastrointestinal TractHomeostasisHumansGastrointestinal Hormones

Identifiers

PMID30239642
PMCPMC6215081
OpenAlexW2890469236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.