ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
STatistical Inference Relief (STIR) feature selection.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enhanced generalized normal distribution optimizer with Gaussian distribution repair method and cauchy reverse learning for features selection.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Prediction of Adolescent Suicide Attempt by Integrating Clinical, Neurocognitive and Geocoded Neighborhood Environment Data.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2025Article
- Detection of Aspergilloma Disease Using Feature-Selection-Based Vision Transformers.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Signature Genes Selection and Functional Analysis of Astrocytoma Phenotypes: A Comparative Study.Cancers · 2024Article
- Individualized treatment decision model for inoperable elderly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on multi-modal data fusion.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- Article
- What makes a good prediction? Feature importance and beginning to open the black box of machine learning in genetics.Human genetics · 2022Review
- EPIMUTESTR: a nearest neighbor machine learning approach to predict cancer driver genes from the evolutionary action of coding variants.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Construction and Multiple Feature Classification Based on a High-Order Functional Hypernetwork on fMRI Data.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Research progress of reduced amino acid alphabets in protein analysis and prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Review
- Article
- Theoretical properties of distance distributions and novel metrics for nearest-neighbor feature selection.PloS one · 2021Article
- iBLP: An XGBoost-Based Predictor for Identifying Bioluminescent Proteins.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- Consensus features nested cross-validation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Nearest-neighbor Projected-Distance Regression (NPDR) for detecting network interactions with adjustments for multiple tests and confounding.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Scaling tree-based automated machine learning to biomedical big data with a feature set selector.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2020Article
- Nearest-Neighbor Projected Distance Regression for Epistasis Detection in GWAS With Population Structure Correction.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Transition-transversion encoding and genetic relationship metric in ReliefF feature selection improves pathway enrichment in GWAS.BioData mining · 2018Article
- Multivariate Optimization of k for k-Nearest-Neighbor Feature Selection With Dichotomous Outcomes: Complex Associations, Class Imbalance, and Application to RNA-Seq in Major Depressive Disorder.IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformaticsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationRelief is a family of machine learning algorithms that uses nearest-neighbors to select features whose association with an outcome may be due to epistasis or statistical interactions with other features in high-dimensional data. Relief-based estimators are non-parametric in the statistical sense that they do not have a parameterized model with an underlying probability distribution for the estimator, making it difficult to determine the statistical significance of Relief-based attribute estimates. Thus, a statistical inferential formalism is needed to avoid imposing arbitrary thresholds to select the most important features. We reconceptualize the Relief-based feature selection algorithm to create a new family of STatistical Inference Relief (STIR) estimators that retains the ability to identify interactions while incorporating sample variance of the nearest neighbor distances into the attribute importance estimation. This variance permits the calculation of statistical significance of features and adjustment for multiple testing of Relief-based scores. Specifically, we develop a pseudo t-test version of Relief-based algorithms for case-control data.
resultsWe demonstrate the statistical power and control of type I error of the STIR family of feature selection methods on a panel of simulated data that exhibits properties reflected in real gene expression data, including main effects and network interaction effects. We compare the performance of STIR when the adaptive radius method is used as the nearest neighbor constructor with STIR when the fixed-k nearest neighbor constructor is used. We apply STIR to real RNA-Seq data from a study of major depressive disorder and discuss STIR's straightforward extension to genome-wide association studies. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and data available at http://insilico.utulsa.edu/software/STIR. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.