Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30239574›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019

A clustering linear combination approach to jointly analyze multiple phenotypes for GWAS.

Qiuying Sha, Zhenchuan Wang, Xiao Zhang, Shuanglin Zhang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A powerful and versatile colocalization test.PLoS computational biology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiuying ShaDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Zhenchuan WangDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Xiao ZhangDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Shuanglin ZhangDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI, USA.
Michigan Technological University · US

Funding

Genetic Epidemiology of COPDU01HL089897 · NHLBI · NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH · PI CRAPO, JAMES D · 2007 to 2021
$56.9M
Genetic Epidemiology of COPDU01HL089856 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SILVERMAN, EDWIN K · 2007 to 2021
$20.7M
Statistical Methods for Rare Variant Association StudiesR15HG008209 · NHGRI · MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY · PI SHA, QIUYING · 2016 to 2016
$437k
NHGRI NIH HHS R15 HG008209NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL089856NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL089897
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryThere is an increasing interest in joint analysis of multiple phenotypes for genome-wide association studies (GWASs) based on the following reasons. First, cohorts usually collect multiple phenotypes and complex diseases are usually measured by multiple correlated intermediate phenotypes. Second, jointly analyzing multiple phenotypes may increase statistical power for detecting genetic variants associated with complex diseases. Third, there is increasing evidence showing that pleiotropy is a widespread phenomenon in complex diseases. In this paper, we develop a clustering linear combination (CLC) method to jointly analyze multiple phenotypes for GWASs. In the CLC method, we first cluster individual statistics into positively correlated clusters and then, combine the individual statistics linearly within each cluster and combine the between-cluster terms in a quadratic form. CLC is not only robust to different signs of the means of individual statistics, but also reduce the degrees of freedom of the test statistic. We also theoretically prove that if we can cluster the individual statistics correctly, CLC is the most powerful test among all tests with certain quadratic forms. Our simulation results show that CLC is either the most powerful test or has similar power to the most powerful test among the tests we compared, and CLC is much more powerful than other tests when effect sizes align with inferred clusters. We also evaluate the performance of CLC through a real case study. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: R code for implementing our method is available at http://www.math.mtu.edu/∼shuzhang/software.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyCluster AnalysisModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Identifiers

PMID30239574
PMCPMC6477981
OpenAlexW2889717408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.