ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
A clustering linear combination approach to jointly analyze multiple phenotypes for GWAS.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- ReverseGWAS identifies combined phenotypes associated with a genotype in GWA studies.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Network construction using sparse Gaussian graphical model based on GWAS summary statistics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A novel method for multiple phenotype association studies based on genotype and phenotype network.PLoS genetics · 2024Article
- Joint analysis of multiple phenotypes for extremely unbalanced case-control association studies using multi-layer network.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- A clustering linear combination method for multiple phenotype association studies based on GWAS summary statistics.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Shared components of heritability across genetically correlated traits.American journal of human genetics · 2022Article
- A computationally efficient clustering linear combination approach to jointly analyze multiple phenotypes for GWAS.PloS one · 2022Article
- Article
- Coupled mixed model for joint genetic analysis of complex disorders with two independently collected data sets.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- AGNEP: An Agglomerative Nesting Clustering Algorithm for Phenotypic Dimension Reduction in Joint Analysis of Multiple Phenotypes.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- A powerful and versatile colocalization test.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Joint analysis of multiple phenotypes using a clustering linear combination method based on hierarchical clustering.Genetic epidemiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
summaryThere is an increasing interest in joint analysis of multiple phenotypes for genome-wide association studies (GWASs) based on the following reasons. First, cohorts usually collect multiple phenotypes and complex diseases are usually measured by multiple correlated intermediate phenotypes. Second, jointly analyzing multiple phenotypes may increase statistical power for detecting genetic variants associated with complex diseases. Third, there is increasing evidence showing that pleiotropy is a widespread phenomenon in complex diseases. In this paper, we develop a clustering linear combination (CLC) method to jointly analyze multiple phenotypes for GWASs. In the CLC method, we first cluster individual statistics into positively correlated clusters and then, combine the individual statistics linearly within each cluster and combine the between-cluster terms in a quadratic form. CLC is not only robust to different signs of the means of individual statistics, but also reduce the degrees of freedom of the test statistic. We also theoretically prove that if we can cluster the individual statistics correctly, CLC is the most powerful test among all tests with certain quadratic forms. Our simulation results show that CLC is either the most powerful test or has similar power to the most powerful test among the tests we compared, and CLC is much more powerful than other tests when effect sizes align with inferred clusters. We also evaluate the performance of CLC through a real case study. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: R code for implementing our method is available at http://www.math.mtu.edu/∼shuzhang/software.html. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.