Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30239117›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and comparative oncology2019

Intra-operative imaging of surgical margins of canine soft tissue sarcoma using optical coherence tomography.

Laura E Selmic, Jonathan Samuelson, Jennifer K Reagan, Kelly J Mesa, Elizabeth Driskell, Joanne Li, Marina Marjanovic, Stephen A Boppart

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and comparative oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura E SelmicDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6695-6273
Jonathan SamuelsonDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois.
Jennifer K ReaganDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois.
Kelly J MesaBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois.
Elizabeth DriskellDepartment of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois.
Joanne LiBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois.
Marina MarjanovicBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois.
Stephen A BoppartBeckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · US

Funding

Intraoperative Polarization-Sensitive OCT for Assessing Breast Tumor MarginsR01CA213149 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI BOPPART, STEPHEN A · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
American Kennel Club Canine Health Foundation 02204Morris Animal Foundation D16FE-034National Science FoundationNCI NIH HHS R01 CA213149
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a rapid non-invasive imaging technique that has shown high sensitivity for intra-operative surgical margin assessment in human breast cancer clinical trials. This promising technology has not been evaluated in veterinary medicine. The objective of this study was to correlate normal and abnormal histological features with OCT images for surgical margins from excised canine soft tissue sarcoma (STS) and to establish image evaluation criteria for identifying positive surgical margins. Fourteen client-owned dogs underwent surgical resection of a STS and OCT imaging of 2 to 4 areas of interest on the resected specimen were performed. Following imaging these areas were marked with surgical ink and trimmed for histopathology evaluation. Results showed that different tissue types had distinct characteristic appearances on OCT imaging. Adipose tissue exhibited a relatively low scattering and a honey-comb texture pattern. Skeletal muscle and sarcoma tissue were both dense and highly scattering. While sarcoma tissue was highly scattering, it did not have organized recognizable structure in contrast to muscle which showed clear fibre alignment patterns. In this investigation, we showed different tissue types had different and characteristic scattering and image texture appearances on OCT, which closely correlate with low-power histology images. Given the differentiation between tissue types the results support that OCT could be used to identify positive surgical margins immediately following resection of STS. Further research is needed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of this method for surgical margin assessment.

Indexed as

Margins of ExcisionAnimalsDog DiseasesDogsSarcomaSoft Tissue NeoplasmsTomography, Optical Coherencedogsmargins of excisionsurgical oncology

Identifiers

PMID30239117
PMCPMC7274149
OpenAlexW2892244910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.