ArticleChild: care, health and development2019
Prematurity and cardiovascular risk at early adulthood.
Article in Child: care, health and development, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Psychological and Physical Health of a Preterm Birth Cohort at Age 35 Years.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Parental fructose consumption induces early baroreflex dysfunction in offspring: impact on arterial pressure and on insulin resistance.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2024Article
- Impact of sex, race, and social determinants of health on neonatal outcomes.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Review
- Effect of preterm birth on growth and blood pressure in adulthood in the Pelotas 1993 cohort.International journal of epidemiology · 2023Article
- Effect of preterm birth on blood pressure in later life: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2023Article
- Accelerated Aging and the Life Course of Individuals Born Preterm.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Prematurity and Low Birth Weight and Their Impact on Childhood Growth Patterns and the Risk of Long-Term Cardiovascular Sequelae.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A test of differential susceptibility in behavior trajectories of preterm infants from preschool to adulthood.Research in nursing & health · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular Morbidities in Adults Born Preterm: Getting to the Heart of the Matter!Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Insulin resistance parameters in children born very preterm and adequate for gestational age.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2022Article
- Molding influences of prematurity: Interviews with adults born preterm.Early human development · 2022Article
- Lifetime cardiovascular risk factors and maternal and offspring birth outcomes: Bogalusa Babies.PloS one · 2022Article
- Review
- Postnatal Expression Profile of MicroRNAs Associated with Cardiovascular Diseases in 3- to 11-Year-Old Preterm-Born Children.Biomedicines · 2021Article
- Novel method of measuring chronic stress for preterm infants: Skin cortisol.Psychoneuroendocrinology · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTheories of early stress exposure and allostatic load offer a lifespan perspective to adult health after prematurity based on these early stressors affecting endocrine and metabolic systems. In this study, we examine cardiovascular and metabolic risk by comparing two groups of preterm infants who experienced a full spectrum of neonatal illness and a term-born group at age 23.
methodsOf the 215 infants recruited at birth, 84% participated at age 23. The cohort included 45 full-term (FT), 24 healthy preterm (HPT), and 111 sick preterm (SPT) infants. Socio-economic status was equivalent across groups. Cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes were as follows: blood pressure (BP), fasting glucose and lipid profiles, weight, waist-hip ratio (WHR), and body mass index (BMI). Clinical and subclinical ranges were compared across neonatal groups and gender.
resultsAt age 23, the HPT and SPT groups had higher systolic BP compared with the FT group. The SPT group had lower weight compared with the FT and HPT groups. No group differences were found on diastolic BP, glucose, total cholesterol, high-density lipids, low-density lipids, triglycerides, BMI, or WHR. Preterm males had more systolic hypertension and low high-density lipids than FT males. Former preterm males and females had high WHR ratios and BMI at 23 years. Subclinical prehypertensive rates were highest for the HPT female group, followed by the SPT females. Only one (4.2%) HPT adult male was clinically diabetic.
conclusionsAs young adults, HPT and SPT infants had early indicators of cardiovascular risk but no indicators of metabolic risk. There is utility in using clinical and subclinical ranges to identify early cardiovascular risk in early adulthood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.