Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30238666›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of methods in psychiatric research2018

Measurement invariance of the Spanish Launay-Slade Hallucinations Scale-Extended version between putatively healthy controls and people diagnosed with a mental disorder.

Sara Siddi, Susana Ochoa, Aida Farreny, Gildas Brébion, Frank Larøi, Jorge Cuevas-Esteban, Josep Maria Haro, Christian Stephan-Otto, Antonio Preti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of methods in psychiatric research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sara SiddiParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1494-9028
Susana OchoaParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Aida FarrenyEast London NHS Foundation Trust, Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Mental Health Services Development, London, UK.
Gildas BrébionParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Frank LarøiDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Jorge Cuevas-EstebanParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Josep Maria HaroParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-3984-277X
Christian Stephan-OttoParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu, Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Sant Boi de Llobregat, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Antonio PretiDepartment of Education, Psychology, Philosophy, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe current study aimed at evaluating the reliability, convergent and divergent validity, and factor structure of the Spanish Launay-Slade Hallucinations Scale-Extended version (LSHS-E) in people with mental disorders and healthy controls.

methodsFour hundred and twenty-two individuals completed the Spanish LSHS-E and the Spanish Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences. The convergent and divergent validity of the LSHS-E was assessed with the three dimensions of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (positive, negative, and depressive dimensions) in healthy controls and people with a mental disorder. Factor structure of the LSHS-E was assessed using confirmatory factor analysis and measurement invariance.

resultsThe LSHS-E had a good reliability in healthy controls and people with a mental disorder (Cronbach's = 0.83 and 0.91, respectively). The LSHS-E was more strongly associated with positive psychotic-like experiences than with depressive and negative symptoms. Four factors were found: (a) "intrusive thoughts"; (b) "vivid daydreams"; (c) "multisensory hallucination-like experiences"; and (d) "auditory-visual hallucination-like experiences" that were invariant between the group of healthy controls and people with a mental disorder.

conclusionThe Spanish version of the LSHS-E possesses adequate psychometric properties, and the confirmatory factor analysis findings provide further support for the multidimensionality of proneness to hallucination in clinical and nonclinical samples.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHallucinationsHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySpainfactor analysishallucinatory pronenessLaunay-Slade Hallucination Scalemeasurement invariancesensitivity and specificity analyses

Identifiers

PMID30238666
PMCPMC6877181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.