Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30238614›Full record

Observational studyActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2019

Validation of the diagnosis of necrotising enterocolitis in a Swedish population-based observational study.

Pontus Challis, Linn Larsson, Elisabeth Stoltz Sjöström, Fredrik Serenius, Magnus Domellöf, Anders Elfvin

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Definitions of neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC) in randomised controlled trials: a systematic review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Necrotizing enterocolitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: a case series examining clinical diagnosis with discrepant versus concordant autopsy results.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pontus ChallisDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7511-7217
Linn LarssonDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Elisabeth Stoltz SjöströmDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Fredrik SereniusDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Magnus DomellöfDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Paediatrics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Anders ElfvinInstitution of Clinical Sciences, Department of Pediatrics, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Funding

Sahlgrenska University HospitalSwedish Research Council 2016-02095Umeåa University Hospital
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe definition of necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) is based on clinical and radiological signs that can be difficult to interpret. The aim of the present study was to validate the incidence of NEC in the Extremely Preterm Infants in Sweden Study (EXPRESS)

methodsThe EXPRESS study consisted of all 707 infants born before 27 + 0 gestational weeks during the years 2004-2007 in Sweden. Of these infants, 38 were recorded as having NEC of Bell stage II or higher. Hospital records were obtained for these infants. Furthermore, to identify missed cases, all infants with a sudden reduction of enteral nutrition, in the EXPRESS study were identified (n = 71). Hospital records for these infants were obtained. Thus, 108 hospital records were obtained and scored independently by two neonatologists for NEC.

resultsOf 38 NEC cases in the EXPRESS study, 26 were classified as NEC after validation. Four cases not recorded in the EXPRESS study were found. The incidence of NEC decreased from 6.3% to 4.3%.

conclusionValidation of the incidence of NEC revealed over- and underestimation of NEC in the EXPRESS study despite carefully collected data. Similar problems may occur in other national data sets or quality registers.

Indexed as

Cohort StudiesEnterocolitis, NecrotizingFemaleHumansIncidenceInfant, Extremely PrematureInfant, NewbornInfant, Premature, DiseasesMaleReproducibility of ResultsSwedenBells stagingExtremely premature infantsNecrotising enterocolitisValidation

Identifiers

PMID30238614
PMCPMC6586065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.